My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0817_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0817_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 3:07:03 PM
Creation date
8/20/2009 4:01:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Roe questioned how tonight's discussion on a turnaround on public or <br />developer-owned property had morphed into not allowing access to the park, or a public road to <br />ensure that connection and access. <br />Councilmember Roe further opined that, if the intent of City is to connect to the park, it may <br />mean a curb cut in the cul-de-sac and a two-lane road that is the City`s responsibility <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned when the City had made a determination that this road needed <br />to connect the park. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that the City had done so in June of 2007 when the City Council, on a <br />3/2 vote, had originally held discussion on a public roadway and the need for access to the park. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in opposition to the motion, concurring with Councilmember Roe; and <br />supporting the connection for the public purpose of access to the park. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Pust. <br />Nays: Roe; Willmus; and Klausing. <br />Abstentions: Ihlan. <br />Motion failed. <br />Klausing moved, Roe seconded, approval of the FINAL PLAT (Applewood Pointe of Langton <br />Lake) by United Properties for redevelopment of 3010 Cleveland Avenue N with a 95-unit age- <br />restricted cooperative housing development; creating two (2) lots for a senior cooperative, and <br />including no outlots, for future development, and public road right-of-way dedication for <br />Langton Lake Drive, including all necessary public easements, subject to the conditions detailed <br />in Section 8 of the project report dated September 15, 2008; <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Willmus; and Klausing. <br />Nays: Pust and Ihlan. <br />Motion carried. <br />Roe moved, Klausing seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1375 entitled, "An Ordinance <br />Amending Title 10 of the Roseville City Code, Changing the Zoning Map Designation of Certain <br />Real Property within the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area from Single-Family Residence <br />District (R-1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an Underlying Zoning of General <br />Residence District (R-3)." <br />Councilmember Roe opined that this action didn't designate building height; but that such <br />provisions would be achieved through the PUD Agreement. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motion, based on building height restrictions; petition <br />previously received for additional environmental review based on solar access impacts; and other <br />mitigation indicted in the AUAR. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the motion; concurring with Councilmember Roe that height <br />restrictions would be set forth in the PUD Agreement; and opined that this proj ect reduced urban <br />sprawl, and made properties more affordable through increased density; and respectfully <br />disagreed with the suggested impacts on solar access. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Willmus; Pust; and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan. <br />Motion carried. <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.