2009_0817_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember Roe questioned how tonight's discussion on a turnaround on public or developer-owned property had morphed into not allowing access to the park, or a public road to ensure that connection and access. Councilmember Roe further opined that, if the intent of City is to connect to the park, it may mean a curb cut in the cul-de-sac and a two-lane road that is the City`s responsibility Councilmember Ihlan questioned when the City had made a determination that this road needed to connect the park. Councilmember Roe noted that the City had done so in June of 2007 when the City Council, on a 3/2 vote, had originally held discussion on a public roadway and the need for access to the park. Mayor Klausing spoke in opposition to the motion, concurring with Councilmember Roe; and supporting the connection for the public purpose of access to the park. Roll Call Ayes: Pust. Nays: Roe; Willmus; and Klausing. Abstentions: Ihlan. Motion failed. Klausing moved, Roe seconded, approval of the FINAL PLAT (Applewood Pointe of Langton Lake) by United Properties for redevelopment of 3010 Cleveland Avenue N with a 95-unit age- restricted cooperative housing development; creating two (2) lots for a senior cooperative, and including no outlots, for future development, and public road right-of-way dedication for Langton Lake Drive, including all necessary public easements, subject to the conditions detailed in Section 8 of the project report dated September 15, 2008; Roll Call Ayes: Roe; Willmus; and Klausing. Nays: Pust and Ihlan. Motion carried. Roe moved, Klausing seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1375 entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Title 10 of the Roseville City Code, Changing the Zoning Map Designation of Certain Real Property within the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area from Single-Family Residence District (R-1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an Underlying Zoning of General Residence District (R-3)." Councilmember Roe opined that this action didn't designate building height; but that such provisions would be achieved through the PUD Agreement. Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motion, based on building height restrictions; petition previously received for additional environmental review based on solar access impacts; and other mitigation indicted in the AUAR. Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the motion; concurring with Councilmember Roe that height restrictions would be set forth in the PUD Agreement; and opined that this proj ect reduced urban sprawl, and made properties more affordable through increased density; and respectfully disagreed with the suggested impacts on solar access. Roll Call Ayes: Roe; Willmus; Pust; and Klausing. Nays: Ihlan. Motion carried. Page 8 of 10