Laserfiche WebLink
substandard building if (1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within <br />three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as part of the TIF <br />District with the county auditor; (2) the substandard building was demolished or removed <br />by the City, the demolition or removal was financed by the City or was done by a <br />developer under a development agreement with the City; and (3) the City found by <br />resolution, before the demolition or removal, that the parcel was occupied by a <br />structurally substandard building and that after demolition and clearance the City <br />intended to include the parcel within the district. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, Minnesota, as follows: <br />1. At least 70% of the area of each Parcel is occupied by the Buildings or <br />other buildings, structures, utilities or other improvements. <br />2. The Buildings are "structurally substandard" within the meaning of <br />Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10. The reasons and supporting facts <br />for this determination are on file with the staff of the City. <br />3. The Buildings may be demolished by the various owners thereof pursuant <br />to various development agreements with the City and the City may consider subsequently <br />including the Parcels in a redevelopment tax increment district established pursuant to <br />Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, which TIF District, if established, <br />shall be established within three years of the date hereof. <br />4. Upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the Parcels <br />as part of the TIF District, the City will notify the county auditor that the original tax <br />capacity of the Parcels must be adjusted as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section <br />469.177, subdivision 1, paragraph (f). <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member <br />Johnson, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />Johnson, Ihlan, Roe, and Klausing. <br />and the following voted against the same: None. <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />