My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0820_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0820_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 2:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bennett <br />October 3,2006 <br />Page 4 <br />Section 907.11— Uwr�er/Agenx Responsibility <br />Section 907.11 states that three violations of this section at any particularlocation may <br />result in loss of property registration. It is not clear whether this language means three <br />violations of the statute and ordinances listed in this section or three instances of the owner not <br />taking appropriate action in response to a violation of the statutes. We are assuming that you <br />meant three violations of the specified laws, and we have proposed revising the language to <br />make that clear. <br />Section 907.14 —Rental Appeals Board <br />The draft Ordinance provides that the Rental Appeals Board sha11 hear appeals relating <br />to applications and appeals arising from a correction order. The draft Ordinance, however, <br />does not specifically provide for an appeal when a properiy owner challenges the suspension or <br />revocation of his/�er registration. We recommend that an appeal process be provided in such a <br />situation. We have proposed language to Section 907.14 to provide for an appeal process in <br />these circumstances. <br />Section 907 .l5 — Appeal Process <br />For the same reason as our suggestion in regard to Section 907.14, we have added <br />language to Section 907.15 to provide for an appeal process when a property owner challenges <br />the suspension or revocation of l�is/her regis�ation. <br />Section 907.15 provides that the appellant sha11 have the right to appear and be <br />represented by counsel in an appeal proceeding, but it does not extend the same right to the <br />compliance officer. We have added language that provides the same right to the compliance <br />officer. <br />Section 907.17 — Inspection Access <br />It is our understanding that the City does not intend to conduct inspections in connection <br />with the registration of the properiy. Rather, it is the City's intent to only conduct inspections <br />upon a complaint from a tenant or a neighbor of the property. We have revised the language in <br />Section 907.17 to provide when inspections may be conducted. The proposed language allows <br />the City to conduct inspections when it receives a credible complaint and recognizes the City's <br />discretion to conduct inspections in other appropriate circumstances. <br />The first sentence of Section 907.17 states, in relevant part, that "�p�rc�p�rty owners and <br />their agents shall permit the compliance officer to inspect all premises governed by this <br />section." Although this Section later provides that if an awner/agent refuses to permit access <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.