Laserfiche WebLink
Debra Bloom, P.E. <br />City of Roseville <br />EXISTING CONDITIONS <br />July 18,2007 <br />Page 3 <br />Current traffic controls include side-street stop control at each of the key intersections along <br />Fairview Avenue. Peak hour turning movement counts were collected at each location by <br />Ramsey County in June 2007. Existing geam�trics, traffic controls and peak hour traffic <br />volumes for the key intersectionsare shown in Figure 2. <br />r An operations analysis was conducted for the weekday a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well <br />]� as the Saturday midday peak hour at the key intersections along Fairview Avenue to determine <br />9 how traffic currently operates and potentially will operate under the other two alternatives if <br />E�1 improvements were implemented today. All intersections were analyzed using the <br />I I �yncl�ro/SiamTraf�e and Highway Capacity Software. Capacity analysis results identify a Level <br />1� of Service (LOS), which indicates how well an intersection is operating. The LOS results are <br />13 based on average delay per vehicle, Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through <br />1� LOS F. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation and LOS F indicates an intersection where <br />�� demand exceeds capacity. LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable by drivers. <br />I �k <br />] '� <br />]� <br />]� <br />��} <br />�] <br />�? <br />�� <br />�� <br />For side-street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate <br />for the level of service of the minor approach. The traffic operations at an unsignalized <br />intersection with side-street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is <br />given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of <br />vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support those volumes. <br />Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not <br />have to stop, the maj ority of delay is attributed to the side-street approaches. <br />�� Results of the analysis shown in Table 1 indicate that all key intersections currently operate at an <br />�� acceptable overall LOS A or better during each of the peak hour time periods, with existing <br />�� traffic controls and geometric layout. The corresponding average side-street delay reported was <br />2S less than 20 seconds per vehicle. Although this delay is generally considered acceptable, <br />�� residents may perceive this delay unacceptable and unsafe. Under Alternative 2 and 3 <br />3+J conditions, all key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable overall LOS A or better <br />3l during each of the peak hour time periods, with the respective traffic controls and existing <br />�? <br />� i <br />�� <br />35 <br />3�r <br />�� <br />�8 <br />3� <br />�0 <br />�] <br />�� <br />geometric layout. <br />Based on these operations results, the improvements do not appear to have a significant impact at <br />the key intersections. However, the improvements do provide safe access for residents, <br />businesses, and customers accessing Fairviern+� Avenue via Oalccrest Avenue. The installation of <br />a traffic signal at the �'air�iew AvenuelOakerest Avenue (West) intersection will create more <br />gaps for the east approach of �akcrest Avenue and Rose Place, improving their access to <br />�'airview Avenue. By installing traffic signals at both the east and west approaches of Qakcr�st <br />Avenue, Alternative 3 creates a safer condition for accessing Fairvievv Avenue, providing <br />protected movements to all users of �akcxest Avenue. Vehicles using Rose Place will continue <br />to benefit due to gaps created by the signal at the west approach of 4akcr�st Avenue. <br />