Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />�o <br />L1 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />2D <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />Cft� Cauncil St�dy Session <br />Mo�day, August 20, 2007 <br />]Page 4 <br />Discussion speeife tn ihe Steer�ng Committee <br />Mr. Darrow's comments specific �o �he proposed �teering comm�ttee <br />was the recommendation o� each and aI� of the finms rccommending <br />creatian of one, while no� mandated by the s�ate, to serve as a lxaisan <br />between citizens, the Ciiy Council and staff, and se:rving a criiicai <br />check and balance �unction du�ng the process, ed�iing and xevze��ving <br />texfi befo:re Public Hear�ngs to make sure �he consu.ltan� and staff were <br />on task. <br />Planning Chair Mary Bak�man, at the <br />�odueed Plar�ning Gamm�s�ion�rs pr� <br />tion of a�teering committee, not�n �t� <br />cussion from each of the propo��[ re� <br />the process, �n oxder �o unde�stan�,a�� <br />datin� �h� Compr�hensive Plan. ���°�� � <br />� ..E <br />Cha�� Bakeman fiirther z <br />agenda items �o contend <br />enced similar �ssues, anc <br />�ensive in m��y.��,i�`�e�en <br />�� ��° <br />grate a1I t����e���-�'it to <br />�'' ;�q- <br />ox xedu���nt docur��n�. <br />rnade with ��� <br />that '�he Cziy C <br />apined that;,the <br />chosen before a <br />of;Mayor Klausing, in- <br />spok�; in favor of crea- <br />t�se brough.t to th� dis- <br />ives, and theiir'value to <br />; p�ints needed for up- <br />that, just a.,��t�e City Council had many <br />�� �. �� <br />, the Plann�ng��'ommission was experi- <br />d that ihe C preh�nszve Plan was ex- <br />ts, and a s�eering cammitiee cau�d inte- <br />r consistently and was no� a duplicative <br />� �.�. <br />�o T�� �� that a st�earing co�nit�ee decision be <br />�.�.� �� �, <br />of t�ie chosen consultant; expressed f�us�ration <br />�had yet to z�ec�ive any proposals; and fizzther <br />s was inver�ed, and �he con�ultan� needed to be <br />� � eomrnitte� was selected. <br />iaising nated that staff adv�sed that all �hxee (3) firms had <br />use of a s�eering commzttee; and noted iirning issues with <br />Mr. Da�ow noted that it delaying a decision on the steeri��g commit- <br />tee until the August 2i, 2007 7nee�ing wou�d not delay the process <br />dramatically; howev�� cautioned that any fi.�rther de�ay would become <br />problemai�c. <br />