My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0827_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0827_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 2:55:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
851
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />1 Ei <br />�7 <br />�I S <br />19 <br />�0 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />2�i <br />2'7 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />�3 <br />34 <br />35 <br />�6 <br />37 <br />�8 <br />39 <br />Cxty Cou�cil Study Session <br />1�ond�y, August �0, 2007 <br />]Page � � <br />Councilmember Roe z-eiterated his support o� Councilmemb�r Pust's <br />recommended ordinanee amendments at thzs time, and that they did <br />not involve subd'avisions arzd �eehnzcal matt��rs to be considered re- <br />garding lot lines. <br />Councilmember Ih�an disput�d the reco <br />Councilmember Ihlan, opining that thos� � <br />clude creatian of small lots in a residen�ial <br />Counc��member Pust c�az-zfied her reco� <br />14, 24�7 f nal repor� af the Single F�mi] <br />Group as follaws: <br />• F'age 1, Sectian B entitEed, "5ubdivisian..Cnde," <br />■ F'age 2, Section C entitled, "Zoning Coc1e,,,' Su <br />tion of tfi�e first clause of Subdivision � _.. <br />Councilmem�er Ihlan��� <br />ments, as long as an ov � <br />�.. <br />lots didn't ereate a separa <br />standard s�zed�:>;and there <br />legally non-con�'or�iing 1c <br />shou�d take thai lnto '� <br />C����ouncxl app�oval. <br />��� <br />��� <br />S�a�'f wa��� directed <br />suggested ��a Cauncil <br />0 <br />proposed by <br />�ns would in- <br />�a�� using the May <br />��t Sp�it Study <br />,ns 2, 3, 4,�na 5 <br />4, 5 and 6�with the excep- <br />�hat she would :suppor� those amend- <br />n' � distnct €or pre-1959 szng��-family <br />���� �u e noting ihat a11 lots were not <br />���� w�s <br />U��81'1���,�` 1121t1aC�S OIl T11lT1IiilUIY1 �O�S 1� <br />��iat the staf�' and the Ci�y A��orney <br />as they drafted proposed language for <br />�o proceed with those i�ems designa�ed and as <br />member Pust. <br />��ouncil �"�iber Roe requested that sta�� review and provide sug- <br />g�� �de lan ua e�'or the Ci� Counci� to consider even if no� <br />�-' , � g � Y � <br />��.m � , <br />spec:�: ��al1y disallowing certain things, �or inc�uding land txt�.sts, pre- <br />serving open spaee, homeowner associations, and othe�' conside�at�ons <br />to mavc the city forwa7rd as a mor� environmental�y-friendly city. <br />Councilmember Pust coneurred and requested s�aff advise the Council <br />w�ere to loak at code in the fulure, and point spec�f cal�y to that lan- <br />� r.�- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.