Laserfiche WebLink
City Cpu�neil Study Session <br />1Vln�day, Augnst 2A, 2007 <br />Pa�e � � <br />1 cremen� fznaneing {T�F) �unding under consideration. �ar. Tanning <br />2 further opined that the ne�ghba�rhood �hould have lots of input into a <br />3 plan, even if it inciuded some xeta��; and asked that t�e neighborhood <br />4 be provided with a waXk�ng �ai�, a n�ce �amz�y restauran�, and at�rac� <br />5 tive, pedestrian and/or bike-friendly �ransportation op�ions wi�hin the <br />�, development. Mr. Ta�n�ng further opzned that the C�ty of Roseville <br />7 had a histo� o£ "cra�ming too znuch stu£� zn a small area;" and noted <br />8 that many Iong-�ime businesses had already relocated, and the com- <br />9 munity and area was emerging as an inner t�er,.suburb, and couldn't <br />10 remain the way it was pareviously. Mr T�nmg;Qpined tha� �he area <br />11 was a"plain ey�sore,'> with �nuch-nee�ed liousing �mp�ovements �ec- <br />��� �..ti :: <br />12 essary, as well as on�-�eve1 seniox �-�`s��g;: and quest�oned if ii wou�d <br />13 happen in the nex� ten (IO} years; �vhile�oting that the ma�rket wou�d <br />14 dictate clevelopment, and �he�i1�;� eede��to get done, <�ven if it in- <br />15 clud�d mixed use re�ail. �� �� �`�� <br />16 <br />�.7 Dan Seabe�g, 3Q98 <br />1 S Mr. Seaberg opined <br />� 9 £or Twin Lak�s dev <br />20 ox of�ces. 11�����a1 <br />������ <br />2 � vious plan��was to�� <br />�� `� <br />22 �w � <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />rently be�o��� <br />in <,was to �E <br />,,,,$>;<> , ,. <br />prior �o 'subrr <br />review a�id :c� <br />Avenue <br />he �as not a prop��� nt one way or the o�her <br />�ent an�c�lor b�g bd� retai�, retixe�nent ho7nes, <br />�pined tha� the b�ggest problem wiih the pre- <br />in such a sr�ia�i space. <br />f ed that tliere was not a d�velopment p�an cur� <br />��1����;'� and ihat ih� purpo�e of tonigh�'s meet- <br />�f t e�AUAR Update was complete and aceura�e <br />�he reviewing agencies for their twenty (20} day <br />29 ; Councilmember �hlan opined the ne�d to incorporate wri�en and verw <br />30 =' ba� comments into the dra�t to be presented to the Fina1 Dxaft to be <br />31 subimztted'to reviewing ageneies. <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />�5 <br />36 <br />37 <br />3S <br />39 <br />Mayor Klausing suggested �hat individua� Councilm�mbers provzde <br />�heir recommenda�io�s io staff �o� ineorporating public cornment into <br />the final draft, for staff input and consideration by the �u11 City Coun-� <br />cil at �heir next meeting. <br />Councilmember �h�an re�terated her opinion tha� pub�zc comment, <br />some of which was very detailed, be co�lected as part of the public <br />