Laserfiche WebLink
The aptions as show�a in. Map 3 were discurded 'zn xanua�y 2001, when staff, tlae <br />plani�ing c€��ssian, a.nd the co�,rn�il a�eed on a combina�ann af aptions 2 and 3 to <br />create the aet�al mix of the Twin Lakes i�d use pkan. Additio�:a.ily, th�y d�cid�d to study <br />the impac�s of big box and st�.p znalls an blacks si� annd seven�-as requ�s�ecE by ��e <br />Regan group owning property tl�ere. <br />�� June 26, 2E�Qlstaf.f'requested that Couz�cil choose betweez� #1a�e pla.�.aa.�d <br />seenario #1 a�d t�Ze "big �ox" o�t�o�—and, ta �ake a fizaal �etexzxzinatio� o� �and use. <br />Council elected ta amend the Twiin Lakes Comprehensive Plar� by accep�ing t�e "no <br />retail"' option cat�ed "scer�ario #I". A�d t�at is �ae Iand use plax� faar Twin �.akes. It is <br />mo�-e fully described in pages 9-11 of the Tu�� Lakes Master Plan. <br />T�� oz�ly rational �'or nna�Cing tl�zs claim (tl�at Map 3 provides a z�ultiple af �ses} is <br />th.at Map 3 is still included i�. #he Appendi� to the Twin Lakes Master Plaxa-6ut so is ��e <br />I988 Plan, a�d other histc�rical ma.ps. "�'heir i�clusio� into t�ae appez�d� k�as no nth�r real <br />significance. <br />The result of Council re�ying on this false claim is a�lawed, inaccura�e, ar�d <br />i�tentiozaally dec�pt�ve, fira�du�e�i revised Twi� La�ces AUAR "update". T�is is �ot an <br />update. It is a ca�ple�e re-write ar�d revisian. �t's expected "approval" as acci�ate and <br />cam�Iete b� a split councii wi11 se�d it on to the reviewing agencies, without ar�y <br />znc4�pa�ation of any n� my citizen's ca�.ments. <br />C4MMENTS TO �'HE PUBL�C <br />The publ'zc has no maani.n.gful say oz partici�a�tion in thzs AUAR p�neess. It's a <br />process between �e Cotu�cil anc� reviewin� ag�ncies or�y. Wi��e ��e Cauncil must <br />address any futu�e cvrn.msnts �£r�v�e�ving agenci�s, it is fre� �a ya�wri and ignoare �he <br />citiz�ns of Rosev�lle. Ti�at is their o�tion, as usual. So clon't be su��ised if my <br />cozr�ze�;ts �ti ignvred, a�ong with other �ossible "public comments" This p�ocess tonight <br />is stric�� far "sho�r". <br />2 <br />