Laserfiche WebLink
R.egular C��y Counci� Meeiin� <br />Mnnday, Augus� �.3, 2007 <br />Page 24 <br />1 <br />PubIic Comment <br />2 Al Sands, 2612 Aldine <br />3 lVir. Sands opin�d I�is concern that the 2008 buaget was not f�r�he� <br />4 a�ong, a�low�n� for public commen� already, pursuant �o comments in <br />5 the mo�i �-ecent City news�etter. NIr. Sands challenged commen�s in <br />6 Mr. Miller's August 13, 20Q7 memo regarding asset repiacement <br />7 furtding, asser�.ng that i� should be done through debt obligation, not <br />S re�erves. Mr. Sands provxded, as a bench handaut, persana� com� <br />9 men�� on Mar. Millez�'s most recent budget m�morandum. The hand� <br />10 outs were eniiiled, "Ciiy of Rosevi��e Full-Time Equ�valent City Gov- <br />1� ern�nent Emp�oyees by Functzon La�ti Ten Fiscal Years;" and "Minnew <br />12 sota 5tat� Aud�tor's Oific� City Financial Data S�arch." Mr. Sands <br />�.3 opined �ha� n�w Councilmemb�rs were only "fed" in�'ormation by <br />14 staff without their i�dependent review; questioned why new employ- <br />15 ees were continually being. added to the payroll; questioned the need <br />� 6 ta cantinue an a.nnual �2 �nzllion fiznding requirement to the Czty's <br />17 Pavernent 1V.�anagement Plan {PN�P); and provided his int�rpreta,tion of <br />18 pex capita eomparisons be�ween t��e City o�' Roseville and the Cz� of <br />19 Shorevz�w. Mr. Sands questioned w�.y the proposed "budgeting for <br />20 c�utcomes" process was not be�ng initiated this year, a� previously dis- <br />2 � cus�ed. <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />2C <br />2? <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />3� <br />d. Update -� Upda�e pn Twin Lakes A�UAR Authorizat�on o� Docu- <br />m�nt Distr�l�utic�n �`or 34-day Public Comm�nt Per�od <br />City of Roseville Economic Developmen� Associate Ms. Jamie Radel, <br />and BxX1 Carlson, Bonestroo ConsuXtants, were pr�s�nt to addr�ss <br />Councii questions or to provide additional information as requested. <br />11�s. Rade� briefly reviewed the reques�ed Council action, �'or adoption <br />o� a resolution, de�ermining that the Twin Lakes Business Park Alter- <br />n�.tive Urban Areawide Review {AUAR} Update was complete and <br />accurat�, and autho�izing dis�rib�ztion to �he commenting agencies for <br />a 30-day public comment and agency review period. Mr. Rade1 noted <br />��at the City Couneil had scheduled their August 24, 2a07 City Coun- <br />cil Study Session to receive public com�nent Qn the AUAR Upda�e. <br />Cour�ctlmember Ihlar� opined her preference to h�ar pub�ic comment <br />ionight. <br />Fub�ic Gvmment <br />