2007_0827_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� vvu, 11llYYL V v�v�x�� u �ae.� --v►. x c�ui a�uxxivi � �.ua� �u�ev��ai a�ivay� �u1�G � � t"t1�C b Ui GG > now in Twin Lakes -- anything that meets current zoning, or anything that > ultimat�ly meets B6 {PUD).? They can rnake theiz decieions on that basis.? I£ > tl�ey build an expensive n�:w light industrial bui3.ding, certainly ihey �ake a > certain (known} risk ba5ed an the comp plan designat�on being oth�r than > industrial.? A� the same tin�e, anyone who wants �o buy �hat propezty down the > roaci and do a k�6 deve�.npmerat nn a.t will have �a fairly compensa�e the owner £or > tl�e va3t�e of the new builciing, basecl on the marke�place. > > ? > > By the w�y, ir does not automatical.ly r�quire 4 votes ta do everything in Twan > Lakes.? As long as the camp plan clo�s not neeci �n be changed, a 3-2 vn�e w�1i > suffice.? It is nnt out oi' �he rea�m of possibii�.�ies for a plan ta cnme fo�ward > that only Tom, Amy, anci I supporG, £or insta�ce.? If zt meets the camp plan and > you like: the p1an, �oo, wotxlct you say that it?is it bad to approve it b}+ only a > 3-2 vn�e?? Of co�rse, �he pre�erence would be to have 5-0 votes on everything.? > It coanes dowzz �n kaaw rnuch each Counci�.membex is wa.�.linq to campromise.? > U1.timateJ.y,?T only control my 1 vote. > > ? > > Dan Roe > > �mdi� na�r7. �c�e:(?C�ri�C��t:.nc�t. � 7 > ? > > ? > > ? > � 7 � i > ------Qrigi,na7. Message------ > FiOIii: C.3327c,tS�Gj.:�'��cic:..3, _ Cr.3T [.itt,.c:;..', l:�t:: °°S�a''iri:;i'C}i.:?�:30,:�: . CO�� � Sent: Monday, Ju1y 30, 2007 1Q:42 PM i 'I'O: Cl�7i . l'OP_;,rit:;OM,'.:c`f5i. , rin'C > Subjec�: Re: fipwt o Gpvern a Ci'Cy --5�. Paul Pioneer Press �ditora.al Fr�.day, > Jur�e 2'7 > > > > > >? If I haci my dxuthe�s, I v�ould not have voted for the Twin Lakes Maste� PZan in > Jt1ne, 2001, as Kiausirzg (and Kysylyczyn, and Maschka) did.? zt is the type of > central planning, on a very big scaie �hat requir�s a devE3.oper with vexy ci�ep > pacic�ts to implement > that I would arg�e agains�.? And so does Mr. Greenhut.? But the Council did vot� > a.t �xa and did incnrporate a.� inta the ca.�y's cnmprehensive p3.an, sa it as ths > law o£ th� land.? Tha� the Counci,� #and K�ausinq) �.n 20Q5 �ried tn igraore a.t wa s > a. ve�y costly mistak�.? If �his Cnunca.�. igna�es it in app�ovinq the A�AR u�date, > ypu wil�. be making an equally serinus mistake.? Recagnize and nbey > the?cons�rictzons your p�edecessors kzav� pl.ac�d on you.? You don'� rea7�iy > believe you?ar�: abnv� the law, do ycau? hitp://webmail.aol.eam/29047/aoUen-us/Maif/�'rintM�ssage.aspx $f7/2f�07