2007_0910_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Bench Handout 08127107 ROSEVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AL SANDS COMMENTS- AUGUST 27,2007: L PROPOSED T�VIN LAKES AUAR" UPDATE" IS tNCDNSiST'�NT «�ITH TI� EXISTINGT'�VIN LAKES MASTER PLAN. II, POLICY ISSUES RELATED TO TFi� P.U.U./BC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION L CITIZEN SLIMMARY OF THE PROPOSED 'l�i�3]w' LAKES AUAR: The Twin Lakes area is between Cleveland on the west, Co. Rd. D on the North, Co. Rd C. on the South, and the Byerly's shopping complex on the East. Roseville began re- studying the Twin Lakes Area in 2000. By January of 2001, a master plan emerged from a group of options included in what is called "Map 3". That plan, together with a "big box option", was the basis for an Alternative Urban Arear�vide Review (AUAR) study which produced a draft AUAR in April, 2001. The purpose of an AUAR is to predetermine the environmental impacts of the proj ect. On June 26,2001, the City Council adopted the proposed Twin Lakes comprehensive map to P.U.D.i86, t�e"Mastsr Plan", and the related AUAR, and amended the Twin Lakes Comprehensive Plan so as to include them in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommended that the Council choose either scenario 1, or scenario 1 a(big box option) for the Master Plan, but not both. Council chose scenario 1, excludingretail. There was apparent consensus that scenario #�1 was the Twin Lakes Master and Comprehensive Plan throughout the ne� five years. During that time, Roseville Properties started discussions with the city in 2002. Later, in 2004, a group of developers formed, including Roseville Properties and Rottlund, a home builder, i�,ta"Twin Lakes LLC". They presented a master land use plan with significant retail and housing, but little office. Council approved their plan in January 2005. The Friends of Twin Lakes filed suit, claiming it wasn't consistent with the Twin Lakes Master Plan, and so need four council votes to move ahead, among other charges. In August, 2006 the