2007_1008_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� l�h II 1 �. 13 the street, the transformed frontage is 139.48 feet. The owners are requesting that since they own both properties and have no intention of selling the undeveloped lot at this time, that they only are assessed for total frontage (110 + 42.�9= 152.49 f�). The City's policy is to assess all individual properties that access the street. Since both properties are existing lots of record, the reconstruction of this road benefits both parcels. In addition to benefit, we need to treat like properties alike. There is one other property owner with a similar situation, 423 & 421 S. Owasso Blvd are owned by the same person, and one of the lots is a"flag" lot with the other fronting the street. As a result, staff does not recommend any adjustment to the assessment. Recommendation: No adjustment to the assessment. I� P-06-02 Roselaw�t Avenue Reconstruction Proiect I� Written Objection: Tom Steiner, 1401 Ro�elawn Avenue 1� Assessment detail: 152923240083 1401 Ros�lawn Ave 132.00 ft $3,695.55 !� ] S Mr. Steiner purchased the home from the previous owners prior to the proj ect being ordered ]� by the City Council in January 2006. The previous owners did not tell him that the City had �� plans to reconsir�ct the roadway. City notices go to the property owner shown on Ramsey �. i County Records. These records were changed some time between January and March of �� 2006. NIr. Steiner was the owner of record for all of the correspondence sent after March, we �3 sent out about l O letters and updates to the neighborhood as a part of the proj ect. He also �� received the assessment notice. �5 �� Mr. Steiner feels that he should not have to pay this assessment because he was not aware of �� the project until it was already ordered by the City Council. He feels that the previous owner �#� should be responsible for the assessment. �9 ��l Staff has discussed this with the City Attorney; he has advised us that we have met the 3 I requirements of State Statute 429.031 & 429.061 regarding the notices for this proj ect. The 3�? statutes specifically state'�'ar the purpose of giving mailed notice under this subdivision, owners �� sha11 be those shown to be such on the records of the county..." As a result, staff does not 3� recommend any adjustment to the assessment. 35 ��i Recommendation: No adjustment to the assessment. �� 3R P-06-12 Couniv Road C ReconstructionProiect- Phase II _�� Written Objection: Kalen Graham, JLT Group, Inc, � Assessment detail: 032923330026 2700 Snelling Ave N 254.76 ft $2,947.77 4] ��. JLT Group, Inc. sold the property adj acent to County Road C to MSpI Roseville in April, �3 2007. The City's notice for Public Hearing went to the property owner shown on Ramsey �4 County Records for the parcel on the preliminary assessment roll. Therefore, the notice for �� the assessments went to JLT Group, Inc. �� �4 � JLT Group, Inc. feels that they should not have to pay this assessment. They feel that the �S new property owner should. Staff has discussed this with the City Attorney; he has advised �4 us that we have met the requirements of State Statute 429.031 8� 429.061 regarding the Page 5 of 6