Laserfiche WebLink
]�l <br />13� <br />13� <br />I 3�# <br />I�� <br />136 <br />9 3'F <br />138 <br />l�� <br />I�� <br />I�] <br />I�? <br />l�a <br />� �� <br />1�� <br />I�� <br />I�� <br />!�8 <br />]�� <br />] �0 <br />I�] <br />I 5 �. <br />i �a <br />a�� <br />]�� <br />15�a <br />i5? <br />I�� <br />��� <br />] 6Ca <br />]61 <br />16� <br />] G_= <br />I� <br />i G5 <br />1�� <br />]�� <br />1 �5lS <br />] 65' <br />I�� <br />]�1 <br />]�? <br />] �3 <br />1�� <br />I�� <br />Question #22: F�om the Communications Budget. .. What do we estimate the 2007 actual costs <br />to be fo� Ope�ating Supplies? Thru 8/31/07 '$700. However, no elections in '07 but we <br />budget assuming its an election year to avoid spikes from year to year. <br />Question #�23: F�om the Communications Budget. .. What bids o� othe� evidence suppo�ts the <br />�$10� request for the survey? $10K will afford us a certain amount of survey questions <br />regardless of who we might contract with. We have looked at many options and depending <br />on the depth and breadth of the survey, we could contract with any number of survey <br />firms. <br />Question #24: F�om the Communications Budget. .. What is the �ve�isite p�omotional video and <br />what bids o� evidence suppo�ts the 10.K �equest fo� videos? Is this a change o�de� fo� the <br />website design cont�act, o� is this �elated to the CommunicationsPlan fo� IK,�025? This is not a <br />change order, but rather part of the City's ongoing attempt to inform the community on all <br />of the programs and service offerings, as well as give prospective residents and businesses a <br />better feel for Rassvilie, <br />Question #2S; F�om the Communications Budget. .. Why is the�e an ext�a �,34K included in the <br />cable communications membe�shi�slsubsc�iptions� This is the City's share of the North <br />Suburban Communications Commission. The '07 bndget amount was �u retrospect, set to <br />low. <br />Question #26: F�om the Communications Budget. ..�e; the $12,450 on Schedule D— if these <br />figu�es a�e based on 2007 actuals a�e we �eplacing all the equipment bought last yea� (editing <br />system, compute�s, ha�dwa�e, etc. ) and if so, why? We're replacing older equipment (not the <br />'06 or'07 equipment) as it reaches the end of its useful life. <br />Question #27: F�om the Recycling Budget. .. What explains the $5SK inc�ease fo� p�ofessional <br />se�vices? This represents the contractual obligation for the City's recycling contractor. <br />The increase is attributed to the switch to weekly pickup and is offset by user revenues. <br />Question #2$: F�om the Recycling Budget ... What membe�ship is added? Recycling <br />Association of Minnesota -$130; Association of Recycling Managers �$20; which were <br />previously charged in the Communications Fund. <br />Question #29: Fi�orn the Recycling Budget ... What is the "admin se�vice cha�ge" The <br />administrative service charge represents the Recycling Function's proportionate share of <br />the general administrative functions that are performed (i,e City Council, admin, finance, <br />legal, building maintenance, etc.). <br />Question #30; F�om the Gene�al Insu�ance Budget. .. What accountsfo� the 33% inc�ease in <br />p�emiums cha�ged by the League of MN Cities? This represents just the General Fu�nd'� <br />proportionate share. The actual share is closer to $85,000. The '07 amount was set too <br />low. <br />� <br />