Laserfiche WebLink
Speciai City Caunc�� Mee�i�g <br />Monday, A�gusi 06, 20D7 <br />Page 15 <br />1 Mr. Paschke advised that such a study wauld be pa�t of a site p�an re- <br />2 view process, not a:rezoning requesi. Mr. Paschke noted that �taf� <br />3 tried �o adh�re to exis�ng Czty Council policies, code� and ordinanees <br />4 ta guide what was allpwed or not a�lowed an a par�icular site. <br />5 <br />5 Councilmember Kough questioned impaets o�' the propos�d 14,000 <br />7 square foo� s�ructure on parking avai�abi�ity and the propo�ed location <br />8 o�'the bux�ding and parking lat confzgu�ation. <br />9 <br />�o <br />I1 <br />L2 <br />13 <br />Mr. Paschke advised that staf�had no� been provzded w�th the name af <br />the proposed sp�cialty groeer; and that parking requirements would h� <br />addressed by code. <br />14 Applicant, Stephani Sundry, Project Partner, TOLD Dev�lop- <br />15 ment Cvmpany <br />�6 Ms. Sundry advised that the grocer was a nationa� retai�er, but that ad- <br />17 ditional inform.ation could not be shared at this time. <br />�. 8 <br />19 <br />20 <br />2I <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />�8 <br />29 <br />30 <br />3� <br />32 <br />33 <br />Ms. Sunc�y advised, when asked by Council�nember Roe, that paro- <br />posed grocery store being requested was substan�ially 1arg�r at 14,000 <br />square fee� �han the vac�.nt "Rainbow" site ai 4,50a square feet. Ms. <br />Sundry furth�r advised that the applicant had no interest in the Rain- <br />bow site; and the grocer was more of a destination type neighborhood <br />�e�a�ler, and that this site was more condueive �o serving their imme- <br />diate tenant cliente�e. <br />Roe moved, Kough seeonded, enactment of �rdinance No. �350 enti- <br />t�ed, ".An 4rd�nanee Amending Title 10 of the Roseville City Code, <br />Changing the Zoning �ap Designation o�' Certain Rea� Property at <br />2750 Sn�lling Avenue from Limited Retail District (B-1-B) to Retai� <br />Business Disi�ict (B�2);" bas�d on the comments and findings of Sec- <br />�ian 5 of the projec� repor� dated August 6, 2007. <br />34 Councilmember Roe spoke in support af the motion to rezone; observ- <br />35 ing that the requested use was re�atzve to the area; noting that uses <br />35 wcre already mixed within the immediate viciniiy. <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />Councilmember Kough spo��e in support of the motion; wi�h his oniy <br />concern about parking. <br />