Laserfiche WebLink
� l�i--�� <br />2 Request for Councrl Action <br />� <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />�a <br />�� <br />�2 <br />13 <br />14 <br />Date: Sep�ember 17, 2007 <br />�t�rn Number„ 5.b <br />De�artment Appraval Ma�ager Appx4val Agenda Section <br />�iem Descriptxa�a: �magine Rvseville <br />Background: <br />Status Repart <br />15 O� July 16, 2007, the City Council directed staff to solicit input, comm�nt and priorities <br />�6 f"rom advisory eammi�sions and the �o�sing and Redevelopmeni Au�hority {HRA) on <br />17 ihe �magine Roseville 2Q25 Gaa�s and St�rategies document which included brainstorming <br />18 ideas from Council and staff. <br />19 <br />20 Camamissions and the HRA were �iven until September 4 to provide a report on the <br />21 docume�t. They were asked to comrnen� on brainstarming ideas and io ideniify whether <br />22 they vve�e high, rnedium or �ow priorities. Although a�� camacxaissxons and the HRA <br />23 �rov'�ded feedback, they did no� respond i� a consisten� format. �ta�'f input theiz <br />24 comments in�o the �R 2025 docurr�ent �sin� their best judgment an each Commission's <br />25 inteni. Copies ofihe HRA and the commissions' reports are attached. <br />2G <br />27 The updated Goals and �trategies report is attaehed. Cammissian and HRA comme��s <br />28 are in italics and arc follawed by the initials of the Cammission making t�e eamment. <br />29 Th� Police Civil Se�vice (PGS} Commission ciid na� �nake commer�ts; haw�ver, they <br />3Q pravided a posiiion siatement and two PCS Cammissioners provic�ec� corr�ment <br />31 (Docuxz�ent 1). <br />32 <br />33 The Et�ics Cornmission did. �not comment on the brainstorming ideas but added two ideas <br />34 (Docume�.t 2). Human Righis (Docume�t 3), P�a��.zng (Dac�m�nt 4) and the Pub�ic <br />35 Works, Enviranment and Transpartation (Dacument 5) Corrim�ss�ons each pxavided <br />36 comments. Parks and Recreation provided a report af pr�oriti�s (Doc�me�t 6) anc� <br />3"� add�tia�.al st7rategies (Documeni 7}. <br />38 . <br />39 The Housing and Redevelopment Author�ty parovided e�tensive caan.ameni (Dacu�aent $) <br />�0 whic�i was included in the document. An HRA member, Jeanne Kelsey, fl�fered fizrther <br />41 cnmment. H�r comments were not incorporated in the documen� but are included �or yaur <br />42 review (Dacument 9). <br />