My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0917_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0917_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 2:57:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
j�rf <br />�.�►�.�. ����C��' � ,�'� <br />�Vlemo <br />To: <br />From: <br />Da�e: <br />Re: <br />Mayor and Cou�cil <br />BiII Malinan, City Manager � <br />Chris Millcr, Finance Directo C <br />Septerrzber 17, 20�7 <br />Repor� on Recent OSHA �nspectinn <br />Date: 9/171�7 <br />��em: 5.c <br />USHA Update <br />Backgraund <br />�az�lier tl�is year, the City was inspected by the Occupa�innal Safe�y and Healt� Admiraistratzan <br />(OSHA). T�is was the first tiz�a �he City �aas been insp�ctec� in �he iast 10 years, �awever �'�zt�zre <br />inspections co�1d canne at any ti�r�e. Regret�ably, the inspectinn resuIled in a tntaI of $1�,Q00 in <br />�'i�es for vario�ts workplace violations. Howev�r, we are eo��fide�t that tlle fi�ae r�vill be r�duced <br />ta $7,000 --. $,000 with sorz�e aninitnal pracedural-t�pe £allov�r-up. <br />Many of the violations were for safety-type de�vices that were lackir�g nn various pieces of <br />�quaprnent. In some ins�ances tl�ese safety devices r�ere not available frorxa #he marzufacturer, <br />and OSHA typically does�'t allow us ta crea.te ou� own sa�eguarc�s as it inig�t result in nther <br />ha�ards. In these iz�s�ances, we ha�e li�tle chnice b�tt to replace ihe eq�ipment wzth new tnod�ls <br />to ensure the safet� of o�r emplayees and avoid fut�r� fir�es. <br />W�ite the �io�atio��s themselv�s are consideree� zninor, w� nonetheless �Zave takerz t�Ze %llo�ing <br />correcii�e ac�ions: <br />d� S�leeted a new Loss-Control Advisory Cons�ltani <br />•;• Initiated ar� effart to re-assess ihe role af tl�e City's internal Safeiy Co�nsnittee <br />❖ Reques�ed $50,000 in the Cit� Mar�ager Reco�a�mended $udget ta replace nan OSI-iA- <br />apparoved equip�ent <br />It s�o�ld be acl�nowledged tha� 1:he City's loss-prevention and safety effor�s az•e subsiantially <br />greater tha� t�ose t�at were in place as recently as 5 years ago. It is li�ely thai wit�ZOUt this <br />at�ded err�phasis, �he resulti�g £'ines wauld have bee�� m�ch grea�er. <br />With the added fnancial resourc�s noted above along wit� sorne int�rnal changes, tl�e City wilt <br />be better posztioned ta avoid worl�piace vialatians of this magnitude in the ftzhtre. However, it is <br />r�cognized that OSH.� requiremertts c�ange aver iirrie anc� it arziay not always be practical to <br />res��r�d in the sarr�e timeframe as OSHA sug�ests. For exart�ple, OSHA znay issue a new <br />rcquirement that a certain piece nf equi�ment carry added safeguards. �-Iowever, we may �nd <br />that the man��ac�urer af �ha� sazne equipmer�� won'� have the new safeguar� immediatel� <br />available. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.