2007_0129_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Regular Meeting — Ol/08/07 DRAFT Minutes - Page 19 shorter deadline if the Council majority chose to enact such an ordinance. Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of the motion, opining that the scope of the study had previously been identified in Council discussions; and a review of City ordinances, some in place since the 19SQ's, was in order. Councilmember Ihlan noted the scope of the study included policy issues related to minimum lot dimensions, odd lot sizes and configurations, neighborhood characteristics, impacts to adjoining properties, and environmental impacts. Councilmember opined that she was supportive of the City Council, with the assistance of staff and the Planning Commission, drive the ordinance review, using sample ordinances from the Cities of Edina and Bloomington as previously discussed; and was willing to reduce the proposed time of the moratorium to six months rather than one year. Mayor Klausing concurred with the concerns expressed by Councilmember Roe regarding the open-endedness of the proposed ordinance language; and opined that this was a very severe and dramatic action for the City Council to take, and his lack of support for the proposed duration of the ordinance. Mayor Klausing offered support for reviewing other options available, including looking at gaps in the City's current zoning system to avoid situations for undesirable land uses; but questioned the need for a moratorium, noting the few applications received seeking exemption, rather than the many anticipated after the last Council discussion. Mayor Klausing concurred that a more specific definition of the Council's scope of study was needed; and asked if the makers of the motion would consider a duration of less than one year for the proposed moratorium. Councilmember Kough reiterated his support of the moratorium; opining that he could support a six month time frame. Councilmember Ihlan expressed her willingness to discuss shortening the duration, as long as a moratorium were in place to consider policy implications for subdivisions without the pressure of pending land use applications; and encouraged the City Council to be proactive on this issue.