My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0212_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0212_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:37:15 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
����� <br />M oss & B� rn ett <br />A Professional Association <br />franchises. Given the apparent conflict between the Order and <br />Minnesota Statutes, this issue could provide ammunition for those <br />interested in seeking changes to Minnesota's cable statute (Chapter <br />238) i n 2007. <br />The Order also purportedly prohibits the enforcement of local level playing field <br />requirements although this prohibition may not extend to provisions within existing <br />franchises that allow an operator to "opt-out" based on more favorable franchising <br />terms offered to a competing provider. Careful examination of existing incumbent <br />franchises will be necessary once the text of the Order has been released. <br />Without question the Order is a significant set-back for L�As across the country and <br />could potentially cost cities and counties hundreds of millions of dollars nationwide. I n <br />addition, it remains to be seen whether the inability to mandate universal service or <br />more aggressive build-out requirements will result in the provision of service to only <br />"high value" subscribers to the detriment of subscribers deemed less valuable to the <br />competing operators. <br />The FCC has also issued a further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to determine whether <br />its new regulations should be extended to existing cable television franchises. The <br />FCC's press release stated that the FCC "tentatively concludes that the findings should <br />apply to existing franchisees at the time of their next franchise renewal process, and <br />seeks comment on the Commission's statutory authority to take this action." There is a <br />six-month window for action on this new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. <br />Brian T. Gragan is a shareholder with the Minneapolis law firm of Moss $c garnet� practicing in the firm's <br />communications law and energy practice group. Brian represents local units of government throughout the country <br />on a variety of communications issues including cable and telecommunications franchising, right-of-way <br />management, municipal wireless communications, tower leasing, pole attachment negotiations, public safety <br />communications and litigation. He is a frequent presenter at state and national conferences regarding <br />communications law and he is a member of the American Bar Association (Forum Committee on Communications <br />Law), National Association of Telecommunications Of�icers and Advisors, International Municipal Lawyers Association <br />(Contracts, Franchises and Technology Section), and is past chair of the Communications Law Section of the <br />Minnesota State Bar Association. <br />���r.— <br />Brian T. Grogan, Esq. <br />Moss & Barr���.t, A Professional Association <br />4800 Wells Farao Center, 90 South Seventh Street <br />hlinnaa�lis, MN 55402-4129 <br />Telephone: (612) 877-5340 Facsimile: (612) 877-5999 <br />Ema�l� ar�g��GStioss-bamettcar� <br />�'a� sil�: wwr�r,m i, r.'�•i��rr�cynmr ii�r;�l i�n�,1r_w.r�xri <br /># <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.