My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0212_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0212_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:37:15 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville City Council <br />DRAFT Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 9 of 38 <br />� Mayor 1� ]�u: in � fc�rther opined that there would only be additional <br />�� time and expense if another law firm was brought in at this time. <br />;� <br />� Councilmember Pust, speaking from her expertise as a litigation attor- <br />� ney, opined that the expertise of the Iverson Reuvers law firm had al- <br />� ready been developed in this fact-specific conflict, and that if another <br />'� firm were hired at this time, it would negate that expertise already de- <br />� veloped, and create the need to relearn facts already in evidence, and <br />�+ as argued over the last two years. <br />1�? <br />1� <br />1� <br />1 :� <br />14 <br />1� <br />1� <br />if <br />l� <br />L� <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />��� <br />�7 <br />�fi <br />�� <br />3� <br />�L <br />3`� �. <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that those lawyers involved to-date had <br />a stake in the development and previous litigations, with Kra�s Mon- <br />roe drafting the original contract now under dispute; with Iverson <br />Reuvers serving as co-counsel with the developer in the citizen law- <br />suit; and reiterated her support for new independent counsel to pro- <br />vide taxpayers with the best results; opining that the law firms used <br />to-date had all given the City advise that had landed the City in court. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Kough and Ihlan <br />Nays: Roe; Pust and Klausing. <br />Motion failed. <br />Pust moved, Roe seconded, approval of the selection of Iverson �eu- <br />vers law firm to continue representing the City on Twin Lakes litiga- <br />tion matters. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Pust; and Klausing. <br />Nays: Kough and Ihlan. <br />Motion carried. <br />Consider Items Removed from the Consent Agenda. <br />�� <br />3�I 4.a Reimbursable Twin Lakes Expenses <br />�� City Manager Malinen provided a brief review of the Twin Lakes Re- <br />��� development Project. <br />�� <br />�� City Attorney and Mayor Klaus�ng confirmed that these expenses <br />�� were reimbursable, pursuant to the redevelopment agreement, or <br />4�:� through proceeds from the developer's Letter of Credit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.