Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville City Council Meeting Minutes <br />Special Meeting of February 10,2007 <br />Page 8 <br />1 so efficiently, to accomplish long-term projects as well as day-to day operational <br />�� issues. CouncilmemberPust suggested that an accurate measurement may be look- <br />:� ing at comparable agenda items and determining how long items took to bring to <br />�� conclusion (e.g., number of times on the agenda and amount of time allotted for <br />� discussion before action was taken). <br />�� <br />� Councilmember Ihlan opined that it may be more appropriate to compare the <br />� amount of time required to get through agendas at regular business meetings as a <br />� determination of efficiency. <br />1 C� <br />11 Councilmember Pust opined that while the Council was adding meetings, it needed <br />1� to adhere to established curfews related to specific items and the overall agenda <br />1:3 and to be efficient in discussion through honest analysis, and whether the Council <br />l� was adding more staff time or just filling more work time. <br />1� <br />1� <br />i� <br />18 <br />1 +� <br />Councilmember Kough opined that each individual Councilmember was a public <br />servant, and items affecting the public required public input prior to him making a <br />decision. <br />�0 Councilmember Pust clarified that she had in no way suggested limiting public <br />� 1 comment. <br />�2 <br />�:3 City Manager Malinen expressed his appreciation for the Council's willingness to <br />�� try a different approach with the overall goal in helping the City Council accom- <br />�,� plish its business. Mr. Malinen requested several weeks for implementation and <br />�6 processing through staff and their day-to-day workloads and suggested implemen- <br />�7 tation with the March 19, 2007 Work Session and April 2, 2007 as an additional <br />�� Work Session as the meeting schedule was revised. Councilmembersconcurred. <br />�;� <br />�� <br />3� <br />;� � <br />;� � <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�$ <br />�� <br />4(� <br />Pust moved, Ihlan seconded, adoption of the Roseville City Council Rules of Pro- <br />cedure dated August 8, 2005, with the addition and incorporation of the proposed <br />rules detailed in City Manager Malinen's memorandum, as modified during dis- <br />cussion, with the exception of Rule 4 of the August 8, 2005 document that would <br />be replaced by language from City Manager Malinen's Rule 2 language as pre- <br />sented; and Rule 3 language changed as follows: <br />"Rule 3 City Council-Requested Items and Location on Agendas" <br />"Councilmembers are encouraged to introduce new items for discussion[,] including background <br />information and supporting materials [w�� when possible][,] [either at a Work Session or regular <br />business meeting] �,�Fic.�sa�r�s�a.]yc. Once an item has been [introduced] �s�$ee� �E�� <br />