My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0226_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0226_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:37:15 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />4 <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />1 f� <br />11 <br />i� <br />1� <br />�� <br />15 <br />1 Er <br />1 '� <br />]� <br />a� <br />�� <br />Roseville City Council Meeting Minutes <br />Special Meeting of February 10,2007 <br />Page 2 <br />Councilinember Pust noted that the August 8, 2005 Rules of Procedure were in <br />conflict with the proposed 10 day advance notice for an item appearing on a Coun- <br />cil agenda. <br />Discussion included supporting the meeting curfew time based on productivity <br />levels of Councilmembers and staff following previous work responsibilities; how- <br />ever, recognizing the need for flexibility based on public input, items being dis- <br />cussed, and meeting specific deadline requirements for agenda items. Couneil-- <br />members by consensus agreed to the proposed language of Rule 2, contingent upon <br />City Manager Ma�inen verifying with the City Attorney the language superceding <br />the language of Item 6 of the August 8, 2005 Rules of Procedure entitled "Suspen- <br />sion of Rules," related to a 213's vote or super majority and stipulations of State <br />Statute andlor procedural rules and their possible suspension. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed his support for "less paper" but his preference for his <br />packet in paper format to ease review and note taking and to avoid the cumber- <br />some copying of documents from electronic format and potential con�usion with <br />document availability. <br />� 1 Discussion included options for individual Councilmembers to print their own hard <br />�� copies of documents; time limitations of Councilmembers; repetition of some re- <br />�� ports coming before the City Council on more than one occasion and how to re- <br />�4 duce that paperwork; additional staff work required to incorporate "returned" <br />�.� documents with new agenda packets; ability of Councilmembers and staff to return <br />�� large map or plan items as appropriate; preference of Councilmembers to apply <br />�� environmental considerations to as much of the packet materials as possible, <br />�� whether that meant going paperless; recycling maps and other items; printing ac- <br />�� cess and capabilities for PDF files; recognizing time constraints; and other consid- <br />��f erations. <br />�1 <br />�2 <br />3� <br />3�F <br />:� � <br />�� <br />3'� <br />38 <br />�� <br />Councilmember Roe noted that as new technologies came forward and with the re- <br />design of the City's websiie, the City could continue to work toward possible <br />password-protected electronic files for Council consumption in obtaining docu- <br />ments. <br />City Manager Malinen advised that additional research and staff discussion on lo- <br />gistics and process needed to be held on a staff level prior to staff recommenda- <br />tions regarding electronic andlor paper agenda packet preparation and distribution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.