My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0312_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0312_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:37:15 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Public Works, Environment <br />and Transportation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Tuesday, September 26,2006, at 6:30 p.m. <br />City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br />6. James Addition Alternatives Discussion <br />Residents will be invited to the October PWETC meeting to provide input <br />on access alternatives. The Commission has been asked to narrow the <br />options down to a couple of choices. Deb Bloom briefly outlined the <br />alternatives. <br />On Alternative #3, Member Willenbring asked if the Rose Place and the <br />Oakerest cul-de-sacs could be moved up farther so that there would be <br />buildable lots at the ends. Bloom said there just wasn't enough room. <br />Member Neprash pointed out that with this alternative, the driveway at <br />2550 �'airview would have to be recon�gured. <br />Duane Schwartz mentioned the possibility of Oakcrest and Rose Place <br />having right-idright-out access. Member Neprash said he didn't see that <br />that would solve the original problem. <br />Schwartz said it would be good to consider the options that eliminate all <br />but one access to Fairview. Member Neprash said it might make sense to <br />use Alternative #�2 but make Rose Place a cul-de-sac. Bloom said the two <br />alternatives that are most cost effective are #3 and #2, but Schwartz said it <br />is an unfunded project at this point. <br />Member Willenbring asked where they should go next. Schwartz said the <br />Commission should at least have a recommendation of which alternatives <br />should be considered based on all perspectives. Member DeBenedet <br />added that the City Council will be lool�ing more at the cost so they need <br />to be very aware of that. <br />Member DeBenedet said the main problem he sees with Alternative #3 is <br />access for emergency vehicles, if something is blocking the new road off <br />Fairview, how do they get in. Bloom said they could consider having <br />drive-over curbs on the cul-de-sacs, but also Snelling will be open as a <br />Page 1 of � � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.