My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0319_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0319_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:38:43 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�� �OF.07A (Revisions and/or Change - Minor Change Lt Location, Placement and Height) <br />states: Minor changes in location, placement and height of structures may be authorized by <br />the Development Review Committee if required by engineering or other circumstances not <br />foreseen at the time the final plan was approved and %led with the Zoning Administrator. <br />$1008.070 �.�eviszons and/or Change — Szgz�i£'icant Changes in Use, Location, Size and <br />I~�eigk�t} states: Changes in use, significant changes in location, size, or height, any <br />rearrangement of lots, blocks, and building tracts, changes in provision of common open <br />spaces, and all other changes to the approved final development plan may be inade only after <br />a public �ea:ei.z�g conducted by the Planning Commission. Upon determination by the <br />Development Review Committee that a major change has been proposed, the applicant shall <br />apply for an amended PUD. <br />$1008.0901 (Control of PUD Following Completion — Changes after Issuance of Certificate <br />of Occupancy) states: Any extension, alteration or modification of proposed or e�sting <br />buildings or structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if they are <br />consistent with the purpose and intent of the final plans. No change authorized by this <br />section may increase the cube of any building or structure, the number of required access <br />points, or parking spaces by more than 10%. <br />The Planning Division has reviewed the recent submittal and concluded the following: <br />� Both the approved PUD and the City Code offer more than one option when <br />consideringwhat type of improvement is being sought. The City Planner has <br />determined that } � l'+�1�.�] �73 �(Control of PUD Following Completion — Changes <br />after Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy) is the most appzap�aie/app�cai�le to the <br />situation at AMC Theater. <br />� The City Planner has determined that the threshold of ; T f�l��. ff �TS L has not been met <br />or exceeded. The massing of the addition — its length and height is exactly the same <br />as the existing structure. The difference is an outward curve versus the existing <br />inward curve. Specifically, the proposed ticket counter extension, alteration and/or <br />modification does not increase the cube of The Plaza by more than 10%. The City <br />Planner has estimated the theater addition to be 109,940 cubic feet while The Plaza is <br />estimated at 8,210,134 cubic feet, which creates an addition of .013%. <br />� The proposed extension, alteration, and/or modificationhas a footprint of 2,390 sq. <br />ft. or .�7 i 3".•� of the approved overall Plaza development under the PUD (182,000 sq. <br />ft.). <br />r The approved PUD provided flexibilityin design and did not specifically <br />suppo�t/ap�ro�e a design or elevation. The Development Review Committee <br />previously approved a similar request for Granite City and its "minor" exterior <br />change from the approved language and general elevation rendering. <br />� <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.