My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0326_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0326_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:38:43 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Franlcs Redevelopment Trafiic Study <br />December 5,2005 <br />Page 3 <br />is to move the full access driveway 70-90 feet west of the existing location. This would also <br />worlc well with the revised banlc drive-thru orientation mentioned in the iirst point above. <br />The site plan indicates that two accesses will be provided from the Franlcs site to the <br />development to the east. These internal connections are a good idea, since they provide shorter, <br />safer routes for motorists circulating between the two developments. <br />The site plan proposes to retain the existing one-way, in-only driveway from the Frontage Road. <br />It is suggested that this one-way access point be eliminated. The design and location of this one- <br />way access point results in some safety concerns. The short distance between the Frontage Road <br />and the internal site drive aisles makes designing this driveway as a one-way, in-only access <br />problematic. There are no physical design features that indicate to motorists that they should not <br />go out this driveway. Signing and pavement marldngs are the only ways of indicating to <br />motorists that they should not exit at this location, and past experience with similar situations <br />indicates that there will be a signiiicant violation rate of the one-way regulation. Another safety <br />concern related to the one-way driveway has to do with the determination of right of way control <br />at the iirst internal intersection east of the Frontage Road. You want the in-coming trafiic �`ro�n <br />the Frontage Road to have the right of r�ay at this intersection. Though you can place stop signs <br />for the WB drive aisle and NB drive aisle, these stop signs are lilcely to have a high violation <br />rate, and, due to the short distance between intersections, it will be difiicult for motorists stopped <br />at these stop signs to determine if trafiic is coming into the site or is staying on the Frontage <br />Road. <br />Recommendations <br />Based on the foregoing information, we have the following recommendations: <br />l. Provide a dedicated WB right turn lane, at least 100 feet long, on the Frontage Road <br />approach to Fairview Avenue. <br />2. Provide additional storage space for the banlc d,rive-th�-t� by placing the drive-thrn on the <br />north side of the banlc. <br />3. Provide a bypasslescape lane for the banlc drive-thru area. <br />4. Shift the north full access to the site 70-90 feet west of the existing location. <br />5. Retain the cross-development access points on the east side of the site. <br />6. Eliminate the one-way, in-only access point to the site froin the Frontage Road. <br />Attachments <br />c: Glen Van Wormer, SEH <br />�'�f:i+�;•��'��.����t,sJV �vl�{r, memoi24505.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.