My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0326_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0326_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:38:43 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />f� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />8 <br />� <br />1 �� <br />1� <br />� <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />DRAFT Monday, Mareh 12,2007 <br />Page 16 <br />Mayor Klausing noted the benefits of receiving preliminary agendas from <br />City Manager Maliner� and receiving items earlier to allow the City Council <br />to question and address issues with staff before meetings. Mayor Klausing <br />noted the other meetings and extracurricular items requiring Council atten- <br />tion during the month, outside of regular Council meetings and Study Ses- <br />sions. <br />Councilmember Roe opined that the concept of reviewing items twice before <br />taking action could still be accomplished without the addition of an extra <br />meeting. <br />1� Mayor Klausing opined that the issue had come up too fast, and had not been <br />�:� given sufficient consideration of ramifications prior to consensus adoption. <br />14 Mayor Klausing concurred with Councilmember Roe's observations, in the <br />l� context of current meetings. <br />l� <br />1� <br />�� <br />l� <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�2 <br />11.� Future Council Meeting Items <br />a. Councilmember Roe <br />Councilmember Roe requested that a future Council Study Session in- <br />clude discussion of the Commission appointment process. <br />b. Mayor HIausing <br />�3 Mayor Klausing requested that each Councilmember choose their two <br />��I preferred candidates for each of the Commission vacancies to be <br />�� voted on at the March 26, 2007 regular Council meeting; and provide <br />�� them to City Manager 1Vla�in�n, at which time staff would provide a <br />�� ranking — not numerical rankin� - to determine consensus prior to ad- <br />�� ditional voting. Mayor Klausing suggested that Councilmembers <br />�� could include input of Commission Chairs or not at their discretion. <br />�� <br />� 1 Councilmember Ihlan opined that the process, as followed from the <br />�� Planning Commission appointments, had not served to be transparent <br />�:� enough for applicants and interested residents to determine which <br />;�� Councilmembers were putting forth which candidates. <br />�� <br />�� <br />3� <br />�� <br />�� <br />City Manager Malinen was directed to add further discussion of the <br />Commission candidate selection process and for further discussion on <br />the March 19,2007 Study Session agenda. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.