Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 26,2007 - DRAFT <br />Page 26 <br />� cord, and that neighborhood opposition alone was not upheld by the courts <br />� as rationale for City Council denial. <br />� <br />� Mr. Reiling expressed astonishment that the daycar� was not concerned on <br />� behalf of the children and their exposure to additional vehicle emissions. <br />� Mr. Reiling opined that the City Council had a special obligation to take care <br />�� of people in the community and watch out for their welfare. <br />� <br />� <br />� c� <br />1] <br />l� <br />t� <br />t� <br />1� <br />1� <br />1'� <br />�� <br />39 <br />��� <br />�1 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�4 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�'� <br />Councilmember Pust clarified that she was not seeking an argument, but <br />noted her reliance on all considerations, citizen concerns, and balancing a11 <br />interests for the overall, long-term benefit of the City. Councilmember Pust <br />read the letter verbatim, so as not to paraphrase the intent. Councilmember <br />Pust opined that she needed to consider all evidence in record, and sought to <br />clarify the daycare director's response so that it was accurately stated in the <br />record. <br />Councilmember Pust further addressed her definition of "contiguous proper- <br />ties," as noted by Councilmember Ihlan, and opined that, while properties <br />across the street would no-doubt be impacted, they could not be considered <br />as contiguous properties. Councilmember Pust observed that, with regard to <br />the hours of operation of the drive-thru, the traffic generated by the daycare <br />was already impacting the neighborhood during early morning hours. Coun- <br />cilmember Pust commended Mr. Reiling on his research; however, noted <br />that his projections and findings were consistent with those provided by the <br />RLK traffic study; and concurred with Councilmember Roe's observations <br />that traffic is an issue already, whether or not the drive-thru is approved. <br />�� Mr. Reiling strongly disagreed with Councilmember Roe and Mayor ��aus- <br />��� ing, and alleged that they were trivializing the situation. Mr. Reiling refer- <br />�� enced the recent agreement the Mayor signed supporting reductions in <br />:� t global warming and local efforts to seek reductions; and opined that the <br />��� Mayor should abide by the agreement he had signed. <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�7 <br />�� <br />�S] <br />Mayor Klausing allowed Ms. Reiling to read a statement summarizing a <br />study done by the University of Southern California and their findings of <br />significant lung impairment to a study group of 3,600 children during a 13 <br />year study; and purported impacts of living in communities with exposure to <br />freeways. <br />