Laserfiche WebLink
�4�1� � -� <br />��� � . <br />Cam�mu�ity Development Department <br />� <br />� Memo <br />To: Roseville City Council <br />From: John Stark, Community DevelopmentDirector <br />�i Date: Apri116,2007 <br />Re: Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Date: 4/16/07 <br />Item: S.d <br />Comprehensive Plan Update <br />5 At their March 19 study session, the Roseville City Council c1�sc�secl i�e need to update <br />{] R.asevill�'sComprehensivePlantoconformwiththeMetropolitanCouncil's SystemStatement. <br />] l:� At that meeting staff suggested three alternatives for updating the plan. Those alternatives, as <br />] � presented, were: <br />��� <br />]� <br />] �a <br />I� <br />A) Making "technical" updates which reflect the requirements set forth in the System <br />Statement, or; <br />B) Creating a new Comprehensive Plan which reflects the current vision of the <br />community and meets the requirements set forth in the Systen� Statement, or; <br />1�a C) Assessing each of our plan's eleven sections and eleven appendices to determine <br />�I �;� which of these is still relevant and which have become obsolete and to undertake <br />I� technical updates of those relevant sections and recreate the obsolete sections in a <br />J� manner consistent with the System Statement. <br />�.�.� Staff s recommendationwas to pursue alternative C. While there was no Council action <br />� 1 made (nor sought) at that study session, the Council seemed supportive of further <br />�� evaluation of a substantive revision to obsolete sections of the plan, removal of <br />�� unnecessary sections of the plan and technical updates to relevant andlor valid sections of <br />�?�� the plan. <br />� 5 As part of that ongoing evaluation, staff has attempted to identify all of the components <br />�� of the existing ComprehensivePlan and evaluate which of those sections, in our opinions, <br />�? need significant revisions and the manner in which the revisions should be conducted. <br />�� Staff s evaluation of the components of the Plan are attached. <br />�� Staff has also drafted a"rec�uesi for Qualifications" (RF� as an initial step in identifying <br />3 i� the most appropriate eonsultant(s} to assist in the Comprehensive Plan update (attached). <br />:� 1 Unless directed otherwise, the approval for conducting the RFC� would he sought at the <br />'� � Apri123 regular City Council meeting. <br />Council Comp Plan Memo 031907 �� ��� � of � <br />