My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0423_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0423_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:38:43 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
��� <br />��� <br />I►/__� � 1 � <br />2 Ta Mayor and City Council <br />3 � �]1 Malinen, City Manager <br />4 i, �'ltiis Miller, FinanceDirect �' <br />5 Date: March 19,2007 <br />6 Re: Consideration of an Audit Committee <br />� <br />� <br />9 <br />]0 <br />1] <br />1� <br />I� <br />1� <br />l5 <br />�� <br />�� <br />18 <br />I� <br />2� <br />�. I <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />Date: 4/23/07 <br />Item: 10.d <br />Consideration of Audit <br />Committee <br />** Reprinted for continued discussion <br />,.� n i�� irn * * <br />Introduction <br />Earlier this year, Councilmembers Kough and Ihlan met with Staff to discuss the possibility of <br />creating and Audit Committee. This discussion was somewhat prompted by the audit findings <br />cited in the most recent annual audit which identified a couple of operating practices that were in <br />conflict with State Statute. <br />The audit findings cited previously have since been addressed and should no longer appear in the <br />future. The one exception however, is the City's employee recognition luncheon. In this <br />instance, the auditors have opined that the City does not have the authority to spend public <br />monies on employee recognition events — specifically when the event is for the sole purpose of <br />recognizing employees by some certificate, plaque, or gift. While legal opinions on this <br />particular matter may vary, the auditors nonetheless will continue citing the City unless the <br />structure and format of the event is changed. <br />Before addressing the audit committee, it may be beneficial to first identify some recommended <br />changes to the employee recognition event. Those changes are detailed below followed by a <br />general discussion on audit committees. <br />�� Recommended Changes to the Employee Recognition Event <br />�� In an effort to preserve the employee recognition event, and remain consistent with State Law, it <br />�� is recommended that the City establish an annual 'State cf the City' - type event that mandates <br />�0 attendance by most daytime-scheduledCity Staff and could include: <br />�1 <br />�� <br />3:� <br />—..�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />3"� <br />?,R <br />3� <br />��h <br />�� <br />�� <br />1� An address by City Officials on current and future projects, initiatives, or other <br />noteworthy items. <br />2� A break for lunch and employee recognition event <br />3� Mandatory training such as Ethics, Right-to-Know, Respectful Behavior, etc. <br />As part of the employee recognition event, the City could continue to provide items such as <br />certificates and plaques as long as the criteria used (i.e. length of service) are applied uniformly <br />to all employees. However, employee recognition items should be incorporated into the <br />Council-adopted Compensation and Benefit Plan in the same manner as the City's Wellness <br />Program (ref; MN Statutes 411.111). By doing this, recognition items would now be considered <br />'additional income' rather than a gift. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.