My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0507_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0507_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:38:43 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:21:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.� <br />:� <br />fl <br />� <br />�: <br />r <br />� <br />�a <br />1 �� <br />11 <br />� �� <br />1� <br />1 •� <br />7� <br />7 �, <br />Regular City Council Meeting — DRAFT Minutes <br />Monday, Apri123,2007 <br />Page 6 <br />of this housing facility. Mr. Miller noted that the applicant wished to <br />address the City Council with additional information. <br />The applicant, Mr. Terry McMillis, noted that he represented his part- <br />ner Mike Swenson and their development partnership entitled, Gar- <br />dens East Limited Partnership. Mr. McMillis advised Councilm�in- <br />bers that their adoption of the proposed ordinance, as prepared by the <br />City's Bond Counsel, Briggs and Morgan, would allow the partner- <br />ship to seek sound financing Far the proposed proj ect, and require a <br />definite commitment by their partnership of $50,000 to secure the <br />purchase agreement for the property prior to the Public Hearing being <br />held. Mr. McMillis asked that the City Council address any potential <br />misgivings they rn��' have prior to that financial commitment, and ex- <br />pressed his willingness to address any questions or concerns of the <br />City Council at this time. <br />�� Mr. McMillis advised that the property had been constructed in 1966, <br />:� and currently provided an affordable housing option in the City of <br />I� Roseville, housing retired a�zd/oz- young working people. Mr. McMil- <br />2� lis opined that the property represented a decent, safe housing option, <br />� 1 but advised that it needed updating and that the developers anticipated <br />2� expending $980,000 total in renovations, at approximately $10,000 <br />�.tii per unit. <br />�� <br />��� Councilmember Ihlan questioned the intent of the developer and guar- <br />��� antee to the City that the project would remain affordable housing, if <br />�� the City were to grant issuing revenue bonds. <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />31 <br />�� <br />�� <br />3� <br />3� <br />�� <br />�� <br />3� <br />3� <br />Mr. McMillis advised that the federal government housing and tax <br />policy required strict land use restrictions for bond financing, and ad- <br />herence to affordable housing based on 30% of a tenant's income; <br />with additional documentation provided by the City's Bond Counsel <br />and the developer prior to actual issuance, and requiring City Council <br />approvaL Mr. McMillis noted that the land use stays with the land <br />and would survive any sale of the property, and that under Internal <br />Revenue Service (IRS) code, if the developer sold the property before <br />15 years, they would have to post a bond, and provided built-in safe- <br />guards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.