My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0514_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0514_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:17 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:22:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Single-Family Residential Lot Split Study Report May 14, 2007 <br />6. The City Council should consider recombination and subsequent re-subdivision of single- <br />family residential lots no differendy than other subdivision requests.(Consensus <br />Recommendation) <br />7.a. The City Council should allow the creation of flag lots and continue to hear them through <br />the variance process. (Majority Recommendation-6 votes) <br />7.b. The City Council should prohibit the creation of flag lots within the City. (Minority <br />Recommendation-2 votes) <br />C. Zonin� Code <br />The City Council should designate three levels of single-family residential zoning districts, <br />which include the following districts: (Consensus Recommendation) <br />➢ Small lot single-family residential, which would have standards less than the current <br />standards; <br />➢ Standard single-family residential, which would have the same standards as the <br />current R1 district; and <br />➢ Lakeshore single-family residential, which would have standards equal to that set <br />forward in the City's Shoreland Zoning Ordinance. <br />2. The City Council should not create a large lot zoning district. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />3. When a small lot single-family residential zoning district is designated, the City Council <br />should review the standards in the Zoning Code for this district to ensure appropriate <br />building height and setbacks requirements. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />4. In addition to the new zoning districts, the City Council should designate an overlay zoning <br />district for single-family lots platted prior to May 21, 1959 to ensure that they remain <br />legally nonconforming lots. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />5. The City Council should evaluate the fees associated with the existing planned unit <br />development process. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />6. The City Council should amend the preamble of the Zoning Code with the following <br />language: "...for the purpose of protecting and enhancing the character, stability, and vitality <br />of residential neighborhoods as well as commercial areas." (Consensus Recommendation) <br />D. Other City Standards and Ordinances <br />1. The City Council should consider creating incentives for environmentally friendly <br />development practices. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />2. The City Council should consider a tree preservation and replacement ordinance. <br />(Consensus Recommendation) <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.