Laserfiche WebLink
Single-Family Residential Lot Split Study <br />Survey Results <br />All Surveys <br />Number of Survey Sent 197 <br />Number of Surveys Received: 64 <br />Response Rate: 32% <br />1. Did you live at your existing home when the single-family residential lot(s) at that was (were) subdivided? <br />91% Yes 9% No (Did not need to complete the remainder of the survey.) <br />2. Were you initially supportive, in opposition to, or indifferent to the subdivision of this lot? <br />44% Supportive 33% Opposed 22% Indifferent <br />Whv? <br />■ It devalues the community. It makes the lots look like inner-city lots. <br />■ Good use of land. <br />■ Why demolish an acceptable home? Incredible waste. Plus, the loss of 25+ (?) trees was also incredibly wasteful. <br />■ The placement of the new home (facing S. to Cty B but addresses as Fulham) is odd and poorly thought out for the <br />sake of neighborhood dynamic and feel. <br />■ The lot had adequate size to subdivide. <br />■ The large lots make this a green and attractive neighborhood. <br />■ No one contacted us on this split. <br />■ Because it is legal to do it. Respect people's property rights. <br />■ Somewhat opposed (resistant to change). Somewhat indifferent (it is their land). <br />■ Personally, I would not want to live in either house. I understand it works for them because they re related. But I <br />wouldn't buy a house like that. What will happen if either family wants to move? <br />■ If those closest did not care I should not be opposed. <br />■ The average lot in Roseville is already minimal size. Although this was a double lot (in length), the house was <br />constructed very near my property line. Subdivide by width not length if you must. <br />■ Generally indifferent but I do not know why something has to be built on every square foot of land - open space is <br />still desi�able. <br />■ Didn't know that much about it. <br />■ We weren't asked about it. <br />■ Because we know the family. <br />■ Concern about resale ability of flag lot. <br />■ Good neighbor. <br />■ Let people do their thing. Putting your retirement home in your backyard is kind of weird. <br />■ We were not informed of the split. <br />■ I felt that we didn't need that many homes on approximately 2 1/2 -3 acres. I felt that 2-3 homes would have been ok. <br />■ Ill-informed, suspected more of a townhome complex type deal, not single-family homes on cul-de-sac. <br />■ Periodically homes are built or remodeled on Parker Avenue. <br />■ I met with the neighbor and his plans were upscale. Could only have a positive/effective outcome. <br />■ Because I live the other side of Shryer Ave. <br />■ Too many large homes built on a small tract of land. <br />■ Bringing young families to the neighborhood is good. Continuing to improve the properties in Roseville will <br />contribute to growth and development for our city. <br />■ Potential impacts on wildlife and runoff (stormwater and spring snow melt). <br />■ A very lovely wooded area was totally destroyed. Estate taYes will go up as they already have. <br />■ Primary reason was inadequate plan for handling drainage/run-off due to raised grade of new development. <br />�lL�ILUU i 1 Of 5 <br />