Laserfiche WebLink
Combination of lot size and house value More complex standazds; must craft cazefully <br />Creates more contextual infill development The "rules" aze constantly changing <br />Difficult to understand and administer <br />Who defines the neighborhood (250', 500', 750'?) <br />some neighborhoods have different sizes <br />Properties on the edge of a particulaz development <br />would be treated differently than those in the center <br />Creates�perpetuates class distinctions <br />Who decides which neighborhoods aze worthy of <br />having lazger lots? <br />I am unsure of the unintended consequences <br />Very difficult to understand and interpret <br />Cosdy to implement <br />Each lot split creates new standazds <br />Somewhat difficult to administer <br />What is the size of the neighborhood? How is it <br />determined? <br />Allows variation in lots sizes. Difficult (political� to decide what goes where. <br />Likely uses objective standazds for application. Maybe be viewed as condoning "exclusive" <br />Protects some neighborhoods neighborhoods. <br />Implementation easy to explain "Why not my neighborhood" <br />Removes subjectivity May be perceived as azbitrary <br />Allows for fair application of standazds Initial added comple�ty <br />Would help with disbursement of redevelopment Eventual ease/unease of management <br />and identify ahead of time azeas that the community ? <br />would support May appeaz to create "special" neighborhoods in the <br />Allows new development to meet more needs of a City of Roseville May be more difficult to <br />diverse community without segregating understand <br />Create overlay zoning districts for neighborhoods More restrictive of property development rights <br />particulaz azeas of Roseville Could allow more open space More complex standazds <br />More fle�ble, thus more open to constructive May create impression of "haves" and "have nots" <br />change Creates/perpetuates class distinctions <br />(Not sure how this is different than creating two or Who decides which neighborhoods aze worthy of <br />more single-family zoning districts, above? What having lazger lots? <br />happened to the "hybrid" idea, which I thought How is this better than just having distinct zoning <br />would blend features of the sliding scale approach districts? <br />with new residential zoning subdistricts?� "Permanenc�' is overlay zoning easier to change <br />Easier to understand than a sliding scale. or get rid of over time? <br />Pro <br />Could address additional design issues not regulated <br />in the eneral zonin ordinance <br />Apri15, 2007 Page 2 of2 <br />