Laserfiche WebLink
C�iy Councfl Study Sessian <br />DRAFT Minutes of Monday, May 14, 2047 <br />Page 5 <br />1 ■ The nature of change; with IV�s. 8akeman observing that this wou�d <br />2 prove to be a key chailenge �acing the City Counczl as they pro- <br />3 ceed with policy discussions. <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />1� <br />12 <br />1� <br />14 <br />I5 <br />�6 <br />i� <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />2'7 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />3 �. <br />32 <br />33 <br />Ms. Bakeman summarized the scope of the sh.tdy, zne�uding appropri- <br />at� dim�nsions (wzdth, depth and area} o�` single-fami�y �ots and <br />whe�he� there shou�d be a uniform standard fihroughout the commu- <br />nity or va�ed, dependzng on its proximity, and any equ�ty issues re- <br />su�ting from varying lot s�andards; appropriate share for sing�eW£amily <br />lots and �heir front �ard lot iine charaetexis�ics; creation or revision o� <br />other single-£amily lai s�andards (including, but not limited �o �ree <br />preservation/replacement; open space preservation; designation of <br />steep slopes as unbuildable, etc.); publ�c s�reets versus private streets; <br />�o� s�zes in con�unction wi�h housing densities, impacts on afforda- <br />bility and diversiiy o� housing stock; and relat�onship of lot standards <br />o� dimensions with the Metropolztan Counci�'s System �tatement for <br />the City of Roseville or �he Imagine Roseville 2025 eommuni�y vi- <br />sioning goals. <br />1VIs. Bakeman summarizcd existing policies and codes in place to pre- <br />serve �xisting neighborhoods (i.e., refusal to spot zone; no comm�r- <br />cial next io r�szdentzal; and encouraging reinvest�nent in current hous- <br />ing stack). <br />N�r. Crref�nberg provided an ana�ysis of maps and report specif cs re- <br />garding first-ring suburbs and comparisons with the City a� Rosevill�. <br />Mr. C�re�enberg persanal�y noted the passionate conviciions spoke by <br />participating resid�nts atiending meetings and serving on the CAG; <br />ba�anced representation of varying apinions on the CAG, serving to <br />he�p discussians and �he process; and noted that, fi�om very disparate <br />perspectives, the CAG ended up with consensus recommendations <br />wi�h the exception o� o�e i�em. <br />34 Mr. Gre£enberg addressed eight of the thirteen compaxison me�ropoli- <br />35 tan eities having a second r�sidential zon'rng catego�y that allowed <br />�6 larger lot sizes, bu� noted iheir square foot�ge ran�es, Ieading the <br />37 CAG to recagnize that one size didn't fit all. �VIr. Grefenberg further <br />38 noted �he number o� non-conforming lots currently exxst�ng in the Ci�y <br />39 {es�imated at 24°/a); and ihe CAG's recommenda�ion that mo�re �han <br />