My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0521_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0521_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:17 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:25:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R�commendations <br />B. 5ubdivision itecommendatinns (continued} <br />3. The Clty Councii shovld amer�d the loi line <br />requirement with9n the Su6division Ordinance <br />io, require that lot lines are perpendicular to <br />the front property line unless a variance 'ss <br />obtpined. {Consensus Recommandaiion} <br />Recamrtt.endptians <br />B. Subdivision Recommendatinns (cnn3inued} <br />,,.,.. . <br />5. �'�e City Council should.amend the St�bdivision <br />Cade to require #hqt new houses being <br />p(aced on n�w streets wiihin a new <br />develapment access the new sPreet in that <br />subdivisian. {Consensus Recommenc[atinn) <br />�BGOI71�i(.'C1Cip�IQtlS <br />B. Subdivision Recnmmenrfations (con3inued) <br />_....... . .. .. .............. . . <br />` 7. A. ihe Crty Council should ailow rhe creation of <br />flpg lots and continve to he,ar them through <br />the variance process. (Majority <br />�@COttit712f1C� qi[Of[—b., V O}25 � <br />� 7.B.Tf�e.,�iry Council should proh€bit the creation <br />of fiag �ois wiihin fhe City. [Minori3y <br />Recommendation--2 vnte'sj <br />Recar�rnen.dations <br />B. 5ubdivisiort Retammendations (continuedj <br />4. 7he Ciry Council shovld amend 3he 5ubdivision <br />Ordinance ta aflow single-fprnily [n#s to be serve� <br />private streets if approval of the private streeY is <br />conditioned on a lega[ mecF�anism (e.g. ne'sghborF <br />associptionsj being in place fo f�nd seasonal and <br />ongoing mainfienance and that the s#reeY cannot k <br />gc+ted or restr]ct traf#ic. <br />(Consensus Recommendationj <br />� E' CO li'I Ti'1.G 11 t� Cf'h I O n S <br />B. Suf�division Recommenddfions (con4inuedj <br />b. The City Covncil shou6d consider <br />recombination dnd subsequent re-subdivision <br />of single-fami[y res€dential lots no differentiy :. <br />thc�n other subdivision requests. <br />{Consensus r�commenc[atioh) <br />�BGO �71C1'1[�t�.C� C['�I OtIS <br />C. Zaning Recommendvliarss <br />_ <br />,,,.. � 1�:" �The Ciry Coundl should�creafe threa�le�els of-sirtgle=family <br />resldenlial zaning disfricis, which inciude the Following <br />districls: (Consensus Recammendarion) . <br />-���Sroall lot single-fomiEy residerrtEai, whieh wauld hnve standards less <br />� 71nan thc cvrrens siartdards; - <br />-- 5ta»dard sf�gle-{amily resideMial, which wo�ld have !he same <br />starrclarcEs os ihe curram Rl d[s�rici; d�vd <br />�- Lokespore sFroale�famiEy resideMiat, which woold hove s�oredards <br />' � ., e'quat ro siiot scr forward in the City's 5horeland Zontng Ord€rmnce- <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.