2007_0611_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment B Bryan ��o�d, Associate Planner, City c��k��sevz�l� Dear NIr. Lloyd, Thank you for your recommendations on how � should proceed with completing my proposed subdivision. I am aware of the fact that the city of Roseville had placed a moratorium on minor subdivisions. I ha�e reviewed the November 15, 2006 memo, regarding single family lot splits and minor subdivisions, the summary of Axaft Recommendations of May 1,2007 and the Final Report of May 14,2007 on single famz�y residential lot splits. The city council and planning commission unanimously approved this lot split on April 25, 2005. I had a survey done and was preparing to record the lot subdivisions with my father, Ralph Beauclaire. My father became ill and we could not proceed with the recording. I called Dennis Welsch and told him of the circumstances and he said that I should write a letter to �itn explaining what was going on, which I did and which you told me you had seen. My father never recovered. After a long decline, monthly hospital and nursing home stays he passed away on August X'�� 2006. The property went into probate at that time and I, as personal representativeof the estate, just received the go ahead to buy the property and I am in the process of taking possession. I had no opportunity to complete the lot split before now and am requesting a reaffirmation of the previous approval. The neighbors had no obj ections to the lot split. When the city ran Dale Street and took a slope easement %azz�. rny father and mother in 1964, they wrote that they would install a driveway access for them. He received 100 dollars for a 60' slope, reasoning that he would get greater compensation fro�a a second lots value. The nearest house to the north of the new proposed lot is the product of a lot split, as is the nearest house to tbe South. The north lot is 7840 sc�. ft. The South lot is 9583 sq. �. My proposed lot is 8660. My other property on Alta Vista Dr. will be 9642 sq. ft. The property across Dale to the East is detention home land, and a cemetery. I would not be changing the nature of the neighborhood unduly, but would be creating 2 lots which are the norm for the area. Thank you, �, �� , T�a�ric� F�c•��1 aire - � � � 4