Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />�2 <br />�3 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />�9 <br />4Q <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />so <br />5� <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />c, PLANNING FILE 07-t}21 <br />Cent Ventures and AmWest �evelopment i.LC in cooperation with Xtra Lease <br />{prop��ty owner) see�ing apprnval of a F'RELIMINARY PLAT, REZONING, At�l� <br />GENERAl. CONC�PT PLAIVN�C� IiNIT DEVELOPMENT (PU�� tn aliow the <br />development of a hntel and resiaurant at 27p0 Cleveland Avenue. <br />C�air Bakeman open�d the F'ublic Hearing for Plannir�g File 07-021. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewec! the request Ceni Ventures and AmWest <br />Dev�loprnent ta place a 5,000 square foot restauranf near the southwest corner of the <br />property, a�-story, 120-unit hotei �ear the rear (east property line); Parking adjacent <br />io Cleveland Aven�e near the res�aurant and between the restauranf and hotel, witi� a <br />small parking fisld adjacant tv the Mount Ridge Road right-of-way; and consfruction of <br />a temporary right-inlright-taut in the northwest corner of the parcef, with a permanent <br />access to be construcied wh�n Twin Lakes F'arkway completec� along the sauthern <br />boundary of the subject parc�l. <br />Mr. Paschke reviswed rationala for staf€ cancems and their ultimate recommendatinn <br />for den�af: no traffic st�dy; prablematic traffic flow; nat a c�se staff was suppnrtive of; <br />and a number of companents of the Site �esign that vuere not consistent with the <br />Master Plan and design standards necessary to pro�ide clear directinn related io this <br />propnsa�. <br />5taff r�cornmended aE�VIAL of the request �y Cent Ventures and AmWest <br />I]evelopment LL.C, based nn the absence of per�inenf information necessary as <br />identified a�d detaiied in Section 8.2 of the staff report dated June 6, 20Di; attached <br />hereto and made a par'i' thereof. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that staff had earlier today received a revised Sike F'lan #hat r►iay <br />address same of the abo�e-referenced concerns, but that staff had not had sufficient <br />time for review and r�cornmendation to the Planning Commission. <br />At the req�est af Chair Bakeman, Mr. Pasch}ce reviewed design characteristics <br />referenced for fihis gateway site as it related �o access and traffic; site functions anct <br />peak hcaurs related to tra�c �ofumes and pntential access ofF Mo�nt Ridge Road; <br />access an Twvin Lakes Parkway versus any access along Cleveland Avenue; Twin <br />Lakes Masier Plan design prir�ciples; integratian of infrastructure (i.e., storm sewer, <br />sanitary sewer, raad network, etc.) throughout th� r�deveiopment area; iimiied <br />exteriar righ# inlaut aiqng County Road C or Cleveland to minimize patential future <br />cnnflicts and how they f# into the overall grand p[an and potential impacts and us�s; <br />and design stanc[ards that would incarporate more dense buildings taward Cleveland <br />Avenue ar along the 'Twin Lakes Parkway, a�d away frt�m exisfin� ar future residentia! <br />pro�erties. <br />Mr. Paschke ft�rihsr addressed parking issues; reducirtg impacts af starmwater <br />management with shared parking as apprapriate; and problematic single-site <br />development and unknown infrastructure im�acts (i.e., laoping of water mains; tying <br />infio sanitary sewer; and utilization of public infrastructure. <br />At the request of Chair �ak�rnan, Mr. Pasch[ce clarified that staff and legal counsel <br />had ag�eed to extend the r�view period ta ii's full 920 days, with a final deterrninatioct <br />needir�g to be rnade by August, unEess the applicant waived fihat extension review <br />period. <br />