Laserfiche WebLink
Regu�ar City Couneil Meeting <br />Monday, Jun�e � 1, 200'1 <br />Page 25 <br />1 a decision on an Env�ronmental Tmpact Study (E�S) within � 5 busi- <br />2 ness days, but that upon request to the Environmental Quality Board <br />3 (EQB) Cha�r, the RGU cou�d rec�ues� a l 5-day ext�nsion to a11ow a to- <br />4 tal of six weeks for �eview; and recommended that �he City Council so <br />5 direct staff to seek the additional time from the EQB. <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />Councilmembe� Ihlan ques�ioned sta�£'s assumption and rationale tha� <br />�he City Council would be issuing a negative declaration on th� E�S. <br />10 Mr. Anderson clarified that this was �h� applicant's s�xbmitted time ta- <br />11 ble, and warding submitted by the app�icant, and therefore their pre- <br />12 sumption. <br />13 <br />I4 <br />I5 <br />16 <br />�r, Stark noted that this would be the p�esum�d action un�ess �he <br />Council faund otherwise. <br />I7 Councilrnember Ih�an provided her rat�onale for ini�ially requesting <br />1 S the schedu�e to ensure that adequate time was provided fa� pub��c <br />19 com�nent, and to provide adequa�e time for City Council discusszon. <br />2o Councilmember �hlan expressed concern with final City Counc�� ac-� <br />2� �ion on �he PUD and declaration on the ETS sch�duled �or the sa�ne <br />22 meeting on July 23, 2007; and opined that this wouldn't allow time <br />23 for public comment, noting additional discu�sion and public commen� <br />24 on �raffic study and mitigation issu�s, and the need for a recommenda- <br />25 tion fram the neig�Zborhood. <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />3� <br />�6 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />Mayor Klausing sough� an alternative p�oposal from Councilmcmber <br />Ih1an. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that �he had no problem with takzng ac- <br />tion on the �A'W' on ruly 23, 2007; however, she wou�d like to delay <br />action an the PUT3 until August. <br />Discussion was held regaardzng normal land use deadline cansideara- <br />�ions; and City At�orney Anderson's in�erpreta�ion nf land use case <br />law, and the process stopping during the EAW review period. <br />Sta�'�' was requ:ested tv look into �he actual dat�s, clar��'y the �ime- <br />frame, and so notiiy the City Council, at which time the City Council <br />