My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0716_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0716_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:17 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:26:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A also incorrectly include a Parking Ramp (760,000 sf). As defined in the Rules, <br />parking lots and approach areas are expressly excluded from the calculafion of <br />gross floor space. Minn. R. 4410.0200, subp. 35. <br />3. Comment: The gross floor space of new development proposed under the <br />Master Plan exceeds mandatory EIS thresholds apportioned on a percentage <br />basis between Arden Hills and Roseville. RUN Comments at 5, and Appendix A. <br />Resoonse: This calculation is not accurate. As noted above, the calculations <br />pro;ided in Appendix A and discussed on page 5 o~the'cotnrnent letter <br />incorrectlv include a Parking Ramo 1160,000 SO. Asdefined in the Rules; .. . <br />parking lots and approach areas are from the calcul~tion of <br />gross floor space. Minn. R. this error, the gross <br />floor space falls well below <br />Arden Hills and Roseville y@$+ <br />4. Comment: It is because of the past record of development (cuqt&tive impact) <br />... that we ask for further environmental review in the form of anK%& <br />Response: The EAW directly addresses cumulative impacts of the proposed <br />development with pas r example, as suggested <br />d to the EA W specifically <br />sideration of background <br />traffic as an example of p <br />.. . <br />Response: The Storm ~ana~em8$b~lan for the campus improvements includes <br />a Conceptual Plan for Surface ~at@hdanagement that is based on the <br />all existing and proposed development. It includes <br />Management Practices to address existing and proposed runoff <br />sment of cumulative impacts to lake quality and need for <br />or improve quality for Lake Johanna and Little Lake <br />en the Cities and Watershed District prepare a TMDL <br />for Little Lake Johanna. The Metropolitan Council's <br />20, 2007, regarding the 1986 EAW notes that the Cities <br />re the responsible agencies for this analysis. The <br />recommends such a study be started on Little Lake <br />later than 2010. The study will evaluate the historic nutrients that <br />have accumulated in Little Lake Johanna that continue to degrade its water <br />quality, as well as the water quality downstream in Lake Johanna. It will include <br />recommendations for future regulation of storm water runoff to the lakes, and <br />requirements for Best Management Practices in the watershed area. The final <br />plan for storm water management facilities for proposed improvements to <br />Northwestern College will meet the requirements identified in the TMDL study <br />and other Watershed and State requirements for storm water management at <br />the time that the final plan is completed and constructed. <br />TKDA Project No. 13529.002 Page 17 Draft Date: July 9, 2007
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.