Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />Regular Ci� Coun�ii Mee�ting <br />l�onday, .�u�y 23, 2007 <br />Page 4 <br />Counc�lmember Pust thanked Ms. Laur for holding the City Council <br />accountable. <br />4 c. Tarr� MeGehee, 77 Mid �aks �.ane <br />5 Ms. McGeh�e opined that there were a number o� eode enfnrcemen� <br />6 issues tha� needed at�en�ion in �he Ci�y, and expressed her apprecza- <br />7 tion that �rhe Ci�y Council was gcaing to work on the zssue. <br />8 <br />9 Ms. IVIcGehee further opined tha� tonight's Councz� Agenda pack�t <br />�0 was so ma�sive, and included num�raus and crr�ical Iand use issues, it <br />�. � seem�d oneraus to ask the City Council to dige�t al� �hat material and <br />1.2 make timely and considered decisions. <br />�3 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />�8 <br />19 <br />20 <br />Ms. McG�h�� provided her histo��ca� perspective on€ the Twin Lakes <br />Redeveiopment Area and issues associat�d with zt, fo� th� benefii o� <br />City Manager N�alinen's brie£ tenure with the Czty, and taxpayer mon- <br />ies spen� to-date duxzng the ensuing Iegal pracess. Ms. McGehee <br />questioned the proeess used by �he Council majority during the proc- <br />ess, especially some actions when there was pend'zng l��igation. <br />21 Ms. McGehec opined �hat the Czty Council needed to pay eareful at- <br />22 tention when na.aking land use decisions; and tha� consideration of de- <br />23 cisians and consequences fnr u�ing taxpayer monzes were not taken <br />24 1igh�ly; and fiirther opined that �he hoped the City Council took in�o <br />25 conside�ation those past Iessons when reviewing several of tonight's <br />26 land use issues. <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />ci. A�°t N�uel�e�, �241 Ac�rn Road <br />Mx. �ue��ear asked the City Council's consid�ra�ion of voting on his <br />land use item, Agenda Item 12.c en�itled, "Consider Approvzng Final <br />P1a� and Public Improvement Contxact for Oak Acres (Ari Mueller} at <br />220� Acorta Raad," noiing tihe recen� pe�i-�ion sent to the Environ- <br />znental Quality Board (�QB} by adjoining property owncrs. <br />35 City 11�anager 1V�alinen advised that staff and �he City A�tarney had <br />36 jus� been provided infonnation tha� thc EQS had received a peiit�on <br />37 rela�ive to his subdivision proposal, wh�ch may pree�ude Council ac- <br />38 iion tonight pend�ng an Environmental Assessment Work�heet <br />39 (EAW). <br />