Laserfiche WebLink
33 <br />34 <br />35 2.8 <br />3G <br />37 <br />withdrawal of the Twir� Lakes West cancept plan, Scenario 1B incarporated tl�is conce�t <br />plan. <br />On Deceatz�ber 4, 2006, �he City Council directed sta�'f to �roceed wi�h DSU iz� �re�aaring a <br />revised scope of wor� i'or the AUAR Update t�at i�aludes the creation of a third <br />development scenario. <br />38 2.9 Oz� May 2�, 2007, the City Co�cil approved a revised contract and associaied scope of <br />39 work direc�ing Bn�estraa (�ormerly DSU) to bring up to date the existing draft of �he AUAR <br />40 Update, �ndertake a traffic sensitivity test, and create a third �.evelapxraent scena�io. <br />41 2.10 Bnn�stroa, with input on traf�c modeling fro�z SRF, �as coznpleted a revised draft nf tihe <br />42 Twin Lakes AUAR. Updated and wili be presen�ing this draft ta ihe Ciiy Cnuncil at this <br />43 meeting. (Counci� received a copy af this draft vvith it� July 16, 2007 StafiReport.} <br />44 Z.11 On July 16, 2007, Ciara Schlicting aFBon�stroo rn.adc a presentation to the City Council on <br />45 the revisions to thc Twin Lakes AUAR Updaie and the reco�nmended process to coz�plete <br />46 this prnject, which ineluded extendz�g the agency review of the AUAR Update by 20 days <br />47 (far a 30-day xeview) and soliciting public input inta �he AUAR Update at the August 20 <br />48 Co�znciI Work Session. <br />49 2.12 The follawing is t�e propased �irneline: <br />50 <br />5] <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />SS <br />S6 <br />57 <br />July 16 — August 3 <br />Ju1y 23 <br />Augu�t 13 <br />Au�ust 13 <br />Aug 14 — Sept 24 <br />August 20 <br />October S <br />Cauaacil re�iews and camment o� revised €�raft <br />Council approve� tirr�eline and process <br />Preseniation to Cou�ci� of Final Draft AUAR. Uptiate <br />CaunciI declares the AUAR Update "comple�e az�d accurate" <br />Agency re�iew of the AUAR Update <br />P�xhlic cnmFnenti at Council Study Session <br />Adoption of the AUAR Update <br />58 3.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />59 3.1 Staff is recommending tl�at between Ju�y 16 a�d August 3, City Cnuncil m�mbers re�iew <br />60 and parnvide cammeni an the drafi AUAR Update. Thcse cornments, along with those of <br />61 sta�'f, w�Il be integrated into a revised Fir�a1 Drafi AUAR Update, and presented to t�e <br />62 Council on Au�us� 13. At that time, staff will �e asking the Council to dete�iz�e the <br />63 docurnent "complete and acc�ate" arzd d�stribute �t to ti�e reviewing agencies. <br />fi4 3 2 Staff is recommending that instead of the req�ired 10-day review period �hat the Cauncil <br />6S allow the dncumen� to be reviewed over a 30-day period. There are significant revisions in <br />66 i�is docurnent ar�d I O days xnay be too short a periad for tY�e agencies io review and <br />fi7 comment. in addition the 34-day review period allows for additional opportunities for pub��c <br />68 input. � <br />C9 3.3 �'znally, the sta£f is recomrnending �hat the Council hold a public rneeting at i�s August 20 <br />70 Work Session to take �ublic cornrn�nt on th� AUAR Update. This mee�ing is not required <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />