Laserfiche WebLink
��4�i� ''L � <br />��� - � , — � �--� <br />II�I �m � <br />To: city council . s - �� �' <br />��r <br />From: Neal Beets � � f � � <br />� v` r <br />Date: December 16,2005 <br />Re: Fee Resolution <br />Date: O1/09/06 <br />Item: 6. <br />Continued from 12/19/OS <br />�'�� Resolution <br />INTRODUCTION <br />l. On November 28,2005, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution <br />10353 setting City fees for 2006. <br />2. Since that time, Staff has studied further the question of fees charged developers <br />for consultant expenses in light of a court decision favorable to the City cf Andover. <br />Based on that review, we recommend amending Resolution 10353 to broaden the scope <br />of the City's fee authority to help the City pay for development or redevelopment con- <br />sultants. <br />3. Specifically, Staff recommends the Council consider and approve the attached <br />Resolution at your December 19 Council meeting so the City's revised fee schedule is in <br />effect for 2006. <br />4. The attached Resolution affects the revenue side of the 2006 City budget but does <br />not affect any of the 2006 Budget Resolutions in your council packet (because they deal <br />with the expenditure side of the budget). <br />PURPOSES <br />4. The attached Resolution has two purposes. <br />a. One, proposed Resolutionbroadens the City's authority to require developers <br />to deposit money in escrow. The current fee Resolution authorizes staff to charge de- <br />velopers for consultants the City retains to evaluate commercial, industrial, multi- <br />family and traffic proposals. The proposed fee Resolution would expand the occasions <br />when a developer would have to pay the City's consultant costs to include all of the <br />foregoing situations plus all utility, building permit, economic development or redevel- <br />opment projects or proposals. <br />b. Two, the proposed Resolution increases the amount a developer must pay <br />from 75% of the anticipated consultant cost to 100%, and it clarifies that this payment <br />may be in the form of an escrow. <br />