My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0109_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0109_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:28:12 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:30:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXCERPT FROM DRAFT <br />City of Roseville <br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Wednesday, December 7,2005 <br />Chair Traynor asked for clarification regarding rezoning vs. CUP within the B�-B zone. He <br />asked for a characterization of Bl, B 1-B, and B-2 uses. Mr. Paschke compared uses. <br />Member Boerigter explained that B-2 is the Retail Business District while B-3 is the General <br />Business District. Chair Traynor asked for traffic impacts. Mr. Paschke explained the work being <br />done by staff and consultant and will be further evaluated with a specific plan is available. <br />Member Wozniak asked how traffic studies are paid for (75% by developer, 25% by City). <br />Member Boerigter asked how Sport Authority\Circuit City would be rezoned in the future. <br />Currently the site is zoned Bl-B. City Planner stated that a sporting goods store is only permitted <br />in a B-2 zone. Chair Traynor asked why the B-1 zone was established on this Frank's site. <br />Paschke explained there are no clear records but a Lawn and Garden Center is only allowed in a <br />B-1 and Bl-B zone. Member Bakeman explained the past history of the proposed, approved, but <br />not-built communications tower on the site. Chair Traynor asked what findings would be <br />necessary to deny such a case. <br />Joe Samuel, civil engineer representing Kimco stated he concurred with the staff report and noted <br />that Kimco is working with neighbors to resolve site and traffic connection issues. He explained <br />the concepts for the uses, and agreed with Chair Traynor that there will be different impacts from <br />that of the franks store. <br />Member Pust asked if there is a concern and\or communication with the adj acent day care facility <br />to the south (no). Chair Traynor asked if parking is adequate for three uses (yes). Member <br />Doherty clarified entrance areas to be on the west and north side of the renovated building. <br />Member Wozniak asked for details of the parking lot connections between sites. Paschke <br />explained the connections and the need to better disperse traffic by use of more connections. <br />There being no further public comment, Chair Traynor closed the hearing. <br />Motion: Member Boerigter moved, second by Member Bakeman to recommend approval of <br />the REZONING from B-1 Limited Business District to B-2, Retail Business District, based on <br />the information contained in Section 5, of the project report dated December 7,2005 <br />Chair Traynor comments on the concern for increases in retail impact through change and <br />improvements. At what point will the City not be able to support those uses? Staff discussed the <br />regulation now in place to deal with increases in impact throughout the community. Deb Bloom, <br />City Engineer explained that site redevelopment often allows for improvement sin public <br />infrastructures such as the Har-Mar to State farm to Zimmerman Lake storm flooding problem, <br />now under control with on-site improvements at Har-Mar (Cub), Target and the Mn. Department <br />of Education buildings. Member White asked if the City could solve some of these problems in <br />PF3680_RCA_010906.doc Page 8 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.