My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0109_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0109_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:28:12 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:30:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�-4ti r_ 4� f���� � �. �# <br />�r�,��t�� <br />����� � <br />��� _ � _ _ � � � <br />Mem o <br />To: city council ,� �- �� <br />� �� <br />From: Neal Beets � � ��� <br />r <br />Date: December 16,2005 <br />Re: Fee Resolution <br />INTRODUCTION <br />On November 28,2005, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution <br />10353 setting City fees for 2006. <br />2. Since that time, Staff has studied further the question cf fees charged developers <br />for consultant expenses in light of a court decision favorable to the City cf Andover. <br />Based on that review, we recommend amending Resolution 10353 to broaden the scope <br />of the City's fee authority to help the City pay for development or redevelopment con- <br />sultants. <br />3. Specifically, Staff recommends the Council consider and approve the attached <br />Resolution at your December 19 Council meeting so the City's revised fee schedule is in <br />effect for 2006. <br />4. The attached Resolution affects the revenue side cf the 2006 City budget but does <br />not affect any of the 2006 Budget Resolutions in your council packet (because they deal <br />with the expenditure side of the budget). <br />. . . �7.�.� <br />4. The attached Resolution has two purposes. <br />a. One, proposed Resolutionbroadens the City's authority to require developers <br />to deposit money in escrow. The current fee Resolution authorizes staff to charge de- <br />velopers for consultants the City retains to evaluate commercial, industrial, multi- <br />family and traffic proposals. The proposed fee Resolution would expand the occasions <br />when a developer would have to pay the City's consultant costs to include all of the <br />foregoing situations plus all utility, building permit, economic development or redevel- <br />opment projects or proposals. <br />b. Two, the proposed Resolution increases the amount a developer must pay <br />from 75% of the anticipated consultant cost to 1�D°�� and it clarifies that this payment <br />may be in the form of an escrow. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.