2006_0123_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. Dennis Wclsch January 6,2006 Page 5 of 6 ingress and egress in the neighborhooc�. The Minnesota Court of Appeals has treated group home parking requirements in a manner assuming that a group home includes as a minimum number of off-street parking spaces the number required by municipal ordinance per dwelling unit. See No�thwest Residence, Inc. v. City of B�ooklyn Cente�, 352 N.W,2d 764, 768 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984), Neview denied (Minn. Jan. 4, 1985) (finding parking adequate where a group home fourplex had eight parking spaces when two spaces per dwelling unit were required by ordinance in a single family zone). The next issue is how many dwelling units make up a group home. In NoNthwest Residence, Inc., the court indicated that each unit in a fourplex constituted one dwelling unit. Id. at 766. �I hus, it appears that a group home operating as a single iamily residence would only require the same number of off-street parking spaces required by ordinance for any other single family residence. Although there is not much authority addressing this particular question, under the policy that a group home meeting the requirements of the statute for six or fewer residents should only be required to meet the applicable requirements for the remainder of the dwellings in the R-1 zone, it appears that a group home with two off-street parking spaces is operating legally. Arguably, the limitation to six or fewer residents in a group home in the statute already anticipates traffic for this many residents as acceptable in a single family zone. If on-street parking for a group home remains a problem, despite having the required number of off-street spaces, Roseville may want to consider placing signs limiting hours or areas of parking in the neighborhood. To ensure equitable treatment of group homes, the key to imposing parking restrictions appears to be uniform application of parking restrictions used in single family residential neighborhoods that do not contain group homes. Thus, Roseville should respond to parking congestion near group homes in the same way it would respond to parking congestion in other areas of the R-1 zones. B. Rental Licensing The next question you have asked is whether a group home can be subject to inspections under the city rental licensing code. Minnesota courts and the state's Attorney General have not addressed the question of the extent to which group homes may be regulated by a city's rental licensing code. A national search, however, revealed a couple situations where group homes were inspected under a city's rental licensing code. In United States v. Village of Palatine, 37 �'.3d 1230, 1232 (7th Cir. 1994), the court noted that the Village inspected a group home residence and cited the home for violations of its "rental property licensing requirements." Although there was a dispute that the Village improperly applied standards applicable to rooming houses rather than single family dwellings, the facts of the case implied that group homes are subject to the same types of rental licensing inspections as any other type