My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0123_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0123_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 4:38:12 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:30:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />��' � � <br />Public Works De�artment/Engineering <br />emo <br />To: city council <br />�. <br />From: Duane Schwartz, Public Works Director'� ,'i �. �� <br />. .�.. <br />Date: Ol/19/2006 <br />Re: Legislative Transportation Funding/4tl�er Issues <br />Date: O1/23/06 <br />Item: 2.c <br />Transportation Funding <br />It is a bit early yet this year, as the sessions begin in March, to detern�ine what proposals will be <br />floated before the legislature regarding permanent dedicated transportation fundin�;. The recently <br />released governor's bonding bill proposal included a nt�r��be�r of transportation project specific <br />func�ing requests. None of the recommended proj ects are specific to the Roseville area <br />Numerous proposals to increase transportation spending were introduced to the legislature in 2005. <br />Ultimately, a bill was passed by both houses to increase the gas tax. This ��€ was supportedby the <br />League of Cities and the counties. The governor vetoed the bill. The City's share of gas ta�� <br />revenue continues to decline due to population increases outside of Roseville and the expansion of <br />the metropolitan area <br />It is unclear whether the gas tax proposals v;���€ be revived this session. ��' v� keep Council <br />apprised of developments in this area as the session begins. The Council may wish to voice their <br />position on this issue at some point. <br />The other issue that is alive this year relates to a bill that was passed in 2005 requiring a referendum <br />on permanently dedicating 100% of vehicle excise taxes to transportation. This will be on the ballot <br />this fall for all voters to weigh in on. The new vehicle excise ta�� generates about 600 million dollars <br />annually. Currently, approximately 50% goes to transportation, with the remaining amount going <br />into the general fund. The referendum would dedicate 40% of the tax to transit and 60% to <br />highway funding. This would help to alleviate some of the funding pressures and backlog of <br />highway proj ects. <br />The Transportation Alliance, of which the City is not a current member, is looking for support in <br />getting the word out promoting these changes. The County may want to create a position on this <br />referendum if they support the dedication of the excise taY to transportation. <br />Another issue that is being fought by a coalition called the Minnesat� Alliance for safe Highways is <br />a measure promoted by the trucicing indusiry to allow heavier and longer trucks on our roads. <br />There is an impact to both safety and our ��x�n� if restrictions are relaxed. See attached <br />information (Attachment A) for more background on this effort. <br />• Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.