Laserfiche WebLink
Longer combination vehicles are incompatible with Minnesota's roads <br />• Heavier, longer trucks are so big and slow they wil[ have trouble merging or changing lanes. Their sheer <br />size will make them particularly dangerous on smaller state and county roads. <br />• LCVS have problems maintaining speed on upgrades. A 15 mile-per-hour speed differential increases <br />aCCldellt I'ISk Illlle tlmes. (An Assessment of Changes in Truck Dimensions on Highway Geometric Design Principles and <br />Practices, The University of Texas Center for Transportation Research, 1981) <br />• Because they are so long and heavy, LCVs create a larger crash "footprint," meaning that when they are <br />involved in an accident, more cars will be involved, too. <br />. Because they have more articulation points, LCVs also have a greater risk of trailer separation. <br />. LCVs do not need to crash to cause accidents. They also cause "systems" safety effects as other highway <br />users speed up, slow down, or change lanes to avoid them. <br />Heavier single-trailertrucks are also unsafe <br />• Heavier truck weights mean a greater risk of fatalities, according to the University of Michigan Transportation <br />Research Institute (UMTRI). (Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study, USDOT, Phase 1, Working Papers 1 and 2, <br />1995, p. 37) <br />+ The extra weight in a truck is typically stacked vertically, raising the center of gravity and increasing risk of <br />rollovers. <br />• Adding an extra axle to heavier trucks to mitigate pavement damage makes them harder to steer, increases <br />the risk of skidding, and makes emergency maneuvers more difficult. It also increases brake maintenance <br />problems, which can lead to longer stopping distances. The Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance found <br />during its Roadcheck 2005 that 30% of the trucks inspected had brakes far enough out of adjustment for the <br />trucks to be taken out of service. <br />Bigger Trucks Damage Bridges and Highways <br />Damage to bridges <br />• Heavier trucks erode the design margin of error that ensures against bridge failure, increasing the number of <br />bridges that must be replaced, strengthened, or posted. <br />• At the end of 2004, there were 1,633 structurally deficient or functionally obsolete bridges in Minnesota. <br />(National8ridge Inventory, FHWA, December 2004) <br />• According to MNDOT, a 20% increase in weight almost doubles the fatigue damage to bridge decks, beams, <br />and trusses. This would shorten the lifespan of bridges and lead to the posting of 10 additional trunk <br />highway bridges and 500 local bridges. (Overview of eridge Design Loadings, Load Postings, and impact of Heavier <br />Truck Weights, Presentation by MNDOT to MN Senate Transportation Committee. January 2005. ) <br />• Nationwide, the USDQT calculated that six-axle. 97,000 pound tractor-trailers — the NAFTA truck being <br />considered by MNDOT — would contribute to additional bridge costs of $329 billion ($65 billion in capital and <br />$264 in user delay costs). <br />Damage to highways <br />* According to MNDOT, even with extra axles, the heavier truck configurations MNDOT has proposed have <br />the potential to cause unspecified localized increases in pavement damage on all of the roads where these <br />trucks would be allowed to operate. <br />Damage to quality of life <br />. Bigger trucks do not mean fewer trucks. Allowing heavier and longer trucks on state roads will divert traffic <br />� <br />