Laserfiche WebLink
3. T��e cai�r�cil �7eeds t€� ��ov� fc�rward as ef�ciez�t�y as posszl�le to set zts own <br />goa�s, includ.�z�g goals For comp�ehei�.sive pla.�� ��eview a�ld corr��nunity <br />visio��i��g — it is ul�i�ately �he cou�lczl's �-es�adnsibility ta cx�at� a cor�z��u�-�ity- <br />l�ased vrsio�xi�ag az�d �1a��ni��g process that caaa wark. <br />4. I wou�d ask tl�at tl�e council ��o� tal�e action ar g�ve fonnal direct�on tn the <br />p1a��zaiz�g co�runiss�an or� #his u�ati� �ve k�ave doi�e our own goal-settzng. <br />Notice �or Land-Use Hearin s <br />Z sup�ort �nore exteazsive notice to z-esidents xega�•di�ag lai�dMuse �eari��gs -- I tlaix�� tlae <br />costs of additio��aal �nailin.gs are jusii�'�ed, but I don'� thizak z�aazled notice is tl�e o���y <br />aitenlative. I would s�zgg�st exploring sax�e other id�as — inayl�e cr�ati��� a web pa�e <br />with iaafp�tnatzoi� azad notices about upcoining I��d use and plazu�i�a� iss�es, a plaz�.ning <br />news�etter (or passi�ly n�igl��a�-��.aod ��ews�etters?1 t�xa# could be se��zt oiit �y e-�ai� as <br />vc�ell as regulaz� maii to save �ostage casts, or setting up a planz�ing ��ntice �-lnail Iisi, etc. <br />Tlaese could also be very us�ful tools ir� the cax�apxe��ensive plan �eview/cammunif� <br />�lanning proe�ss. Could we Iool� inio so�n� of t�aese zdeas and disc�tss agaiz� at a future <br />meetiz��? <br />Ix�te���ational Pro�ez�:v Maiz�tel�a�ice Code <br />� a�pzeeiate the staff response to rr�y a�ezno raiszng conceins about e�aforce�ei�t issues, <br />and look fozward to �etting legal analysis fronl the cii:y attorney. Since this is a very <br />ca�zplex prQposal, a��d clos�ly tzed io tlae �aroposed re��tal housing code, I wn�Id suggest <br />that it be put o�a tk�e agenda fo�' additional p�blic hearings (perhaps i:�� HRA cou.ld cio this <br />in cor�nection �itkz a�di�ia�a� heara�gs a�� rez��al Iicensing)? � vvau�d a�so �ike to pz�opose <br />ai�d cliscuss az�endmezzts ta the code, i#� i�eeded, ir1 respanse �o fhe city a�orney's apii�iQns <br />and the co�zce�-ns outlined in rr�y merno, before tlae caunci� votes on. fi��al adoptioi;. <br />Ordina�lce on Traffic Coz�trol Si��s <br />I wauld be wi��ing to suppori a Tra�'�'ic Safety Cox��ni��ee to iz�vestzgate, s�.udy, a�zd n:aa��e <br />t-ecomr.�endatiQZZS tQ tlze Cauz�ci�, but believe t�7e CaunciI needs tn �Zave t��e ultzn�ate <br />authority to z�r�ake decis�o��s on t�afiic co��tro1 and signs (as state 1aw says), <br />Lic�uar Cita#iora A�aeals <br />I would �il�e to xec�uest �Iae followi�lg infonnatiozx, axad xequest that this lic�uor ap�ea�s <br />issue b� put on the agenda agai�� at a f�ture naeetzrag af�er the initin�.aatzoX� is avai�abl�: <br />X. Caulc� the counezl �lease IZave a copy of th� fonaa letter sei�t to Iice��sees irlfar-�ning <br />tlae�� a� tl��ir xight to ap�eal to the ci�y managez? <br />2. What autlzori�y is there i�z city ordii7ances far appealing liqunr citations tio tl�e ci�y <br />rz�� an�ager? <br />3. Iit1�e aazswer ta tlazs question is "iioile", tl�e eaunczl s��ould sclzedule p��1ic <br />heaxiz�zgs o�� the penaities under 302.15(C}. <br />