My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0313_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0313_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:36:40 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:32:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 02/27/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 28 <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn questioned the City Council's lack of in-depth <br />discussion as to the status and future of the site; future expense <br />for maintenance of the site (i.e., grading, fencing, and other <br />corrections); and questioned whether this was the best and <br />highest use for this land, or should it be a transfer site or used as <br />a soccer field. Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that these were policy <br />questions needing to be addressed by the City Council. Mr. <br />Kysylyczyn further noted the changes to the refuse hauler <br />industry and requirements for them to provide leaf pick up. Mr. <br />Kysylyczyn also questioned if the City had referred this item to <br />the City's PWET for their recommendation. <br />Ihlan moved, Pust seconded, authorizing purchase of a used <br />compost aeration unit from Apollo Equipment, after verifying <br />the condition, and transport of the unit to the City, at a total cost <br />not to exceed $40,000.00. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Kough; Pust; Ihlan; Maschka and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />12. Staff Report on Parking Staff Report on <br />City Manager Neal Beets summarized staffs comprehensive Par�ing <br />written review of parking issues, as requested by the City <br />Council at their February 13, 2006 Council meeting. <br />City Manager Beets highlighted three points: <br />1) In staffs review, it became apparent that there was no <br />evidence of an increase in complaints to the Police andlor <br />Community Development Departments; complaints <br />appeared stable, including parking complaints. <br />2) Current City code has numerous provisions regarding <br />parking, arising over the course of years as complaints <br />were brought forward to the City Council and staff; with <br />solutions tried to resolve those issues, and eventually <br />falling into certain sections and codified in City Code as <br />applicable. <br />3) Experience has proven that while attempts were made to <br />achieve equilibrium, there was seldom found unanimity or <br />consensus in the community regarding parking issues. <br />City Manager Beets provided staffs recommendation that a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.