Laserfiche WebLink
Klausing's claims; and the corrections <br />Claim #7: Mr. Klausing claims that the procedure is a result of the difficulties <br />council members previously encountered placing items on the agenda. <br />Correction #1: The policy predates any imagined difficulties claimed by Mr. <br />Klausing. The policy of allowing council members to place items on the agenda <br />was instituted in January 2002 on a 3-2 vote with Mr. Klausing and Mr. Maschka <br />voting no. <br />Wth the election of Mr. Kough and Mr. Schroeder in 2002, there was a <br />substantial shift in the council's thinking on this issue. The council felt that this <br />meeting was the council's meeting, not the manager's meeting. There was also <br />a feeling that since members were independently elected and had different <br />opinions and goals, those members had an inherent right to raise items at <br />meetings for discussion without receiving prior approval by other members. <br />The noon Wednesday administrative policy was adopted soon thereafter, <br />because staff indicated frustration with members who would create extra work by <br />trying to place items on the agenda during the assembly process. <br />Claim #2: Mr. Klausing's difficulty of placing items on the agenda is the fault of <br />actions by Mayor Kysylyczyn. <br />Correction #2: The difficulty Mr. Klausing refers to in his memo was of his own <br />making. He refused to follow the system and attempted to submit an item after <br />the Wednesday noon administrative deadline. When he was told he would have <br />to wait one week, he had Mr. Beets prepare a second agenda for the meeting <br />with hi�:it�nns. The council-resolved the issueseveral dap� later by setting aside: :: <br />Mr. Klausing's agenda, asking him to wait one week, and requesting that he �� � <br />follow the system in place. Tl�e fact that Mr. Klausing failed to mention is that his <br />agenda requests were to call yet another vote on some items which had been <br />voted down several times in the past. <br />Claim #3: Mr. Klausing's claims that the council agenda policy is connected to <br />goal setting and was intended to be used by staff to place items on the agenda. <br />Correction #3: The council agenda policy process passed in 2002, council goal <br />setting sessions, and staff initiated agenda items, are three separate distinct <br />issues. T h e three were never connected. <br />Mr. Klausing's description of the process, staff leading the council on policy <br />issues, was the old process prior to 2002. The council agenda policy passed in <br />2002 was a way to break the previous system of the tail wagging the dog. <br />