Laserfiche WebLink
_ Little impact on Roseville residents; most of the burden of a sales tax would <br />be borne by non-residents. Since a voter referendum is required, residents <br />— make the final choice. Could be coupled with a community center project. <br />b. Con: Impact on local businesses may put them at a competitive disadvan- <br />tage. Uncertainty whether state legislature would approve general or special <br />legislation allowing such a referendum. Lets state off the hook. <br />3. Seek voter approval for a local bond referendum. <br />r <br />a. Pro: Could be coupled with a general Parks and Recreation bond issue. B� <br />ing a referendum, voters can definitively indicate their support or opposition " <br />to various �'&R projects. , _ <br />b. Con: Higher local taxes. Lets state off the hook. <br />4. Adjust P&R annual budget to rely more heavily on local taxes to support the OVAL. <br />a. Pro: Greater transparency. <br />b. Con: Either higher local taxes or eliminatian/reduction in other tax- <br />supported city services. Lets state off the hook. <br />IIY. REOUEST <br />City Council direction about seeking additional funding for the OVAL. <br />����� �� <br />2 <br />